Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32723387›Full record

ArticleFluids and barriers of the CNS2020

Contribution of brain pericytes in blood-brain barrier formation and maintenance: a transcriptomic study of cocultured human endothelial cells derived from hematopoietic stem cells.

Marjolein Heymans, Ricardo Figueiredo, Lucie Dehouck, David Francisco, Yasuteru Sano, Fumitaka Shimizu, Takashi Kanda, Rémy Bruggmann, Britta Engelhardt, Peter Winter and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Fluids and barriers of the CNS, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 89 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Activated protein C in epilepsy pathophysiology.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Marjolein HeymansLaboratoire de la Barrière Hémato-Encéphalique (LBHE), Univ. Artois, UR 2465, 62300, Lens, France.
Ricardo FigueiredoGenXPro GmbH, Frankfurt, Germany.
Lucie DehouckLaboratoire de la Barrière Hémato-Encéphalique (LBHE), Univ. Artois, UR 2465, 62300, Lens, France.
David FranciscoInterfaculty Bioinformatics Unit and Swiss, Institute of Bioinformatics, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Yasuteru SanoDepartment of Neurology and Clinical Neuroscience, Graduate School of Medicine, Yamaguchi University, Ube, Japan.
Fumitaka ShimizuDepartment of Neurology and Clinical Neuroscience, Graduate School of Medicine, Yamaguchi University, Ube, Japan.
Takashi KandaDepartment of Neurology and Clinical Neuroscience, Graduate School of Medicine, Yamaguchi University, Ube, Japan.
Rémy BruggmannInterfaculty Bioinformatics Unit and Swiss, Institute of Bioinformatics, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Britta EngelhardtTheodor Kocher Institute, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Peter WinterGenXPro GmbH, Frankfurt, Germany.
Fabien GosseletLaboratoire de la Barrière Hémato-Encéphalique (LBHE), Univ. Artois, UR 2465, 62300, Lens, France.
Maxime CulotLaboratoire de la Barrière Hémato-Encéphalique (LBHE), Univ. Artois, UR 2465, 62300, Lens, France. maxime.culot@univ-artois.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7452-0867
Université d'Artois · FRUniversity of Bern · CHYamaguchi University · JPGenXPro (Germany) · DEGoethe University Frankfurt · DE

Funding

H2020 European Institute of Innovation and Technology MSCA-ITN 675619
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Formation, maintenance, and repair of the blood-brain barrier (BBB) are critical for central nervous system homeostasis. The interaction of endothelial cells (ECs) with brain pericytes is known to induce BBB characteristics in brain ECs during embryogenesis and can be used to differentiate human ECs from stem cell source in in vitro BBB models. However, the molecular events involved in BBB maturation are not fully understood. To this end, human ECs derived from hematopoietic stem cells were cultivated with either primary bovine or cell line-derived human brain pericytes to induce BBB formation. Subsequently, the transcriptomic profiles of solocultured vs. cocultured ECs were analysed over time by Massive Analysis of cDNA Ends (MACE) technology. This RNA sequencing method is a 3'-end targeted, tag-based, reduced representation transcriptome profiling technique, that can reliably quantify all polyadenylated transcripts including those with low expression. By analysing the generated transcriptomic profiles, we can explore the molecular processes responsible for the functional changes observed in ECs in coculture with brain pericytes (e.g. barrier tightening, changes in the expression of transporters and receptors). Our results identified several up- and downregulated genes and signaling pathways that provide a valuable data source to further delineate complex molecular processes that are involved in BBB formation and BBB maintenance. In addition, this data provides a source to identify novel targets for central nervous system drug delivery strategies.

Indexed as

TranscriptomeBlood-Brain BarrierCoculture TechniquesEndothelial CellsGene Expression ProfilingHematopoietic Stem CellsHumansPericytesSignal TransductionBBB formation3Blood–brain barrier1Brain endothelial cells6Brain pericytes8Central nervous system5Human hematopoietic stem cells7In vitro4Transcriptome2

Identifiers

PMID32723387
PMCPMC7385894
OpenAlexW3045585426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.