Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32723358›Full record

ArticleBMC veterinary research2020

The prevalence and mechanism of fluoroquinolone resistance in Escherichia coli isolated from swine farms in China.

Ping Cheng, Yuqi Yang, Fulei Li, Xiaoting Li, Haibin Liu, Saqib Ali Fazilani, Wenxin Guo, Guofeng Xu, Xiuying Zhang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC veterinary research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Two Multidrug-ResistantPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Resistance Mechanisms of Fluoroquinolone inAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Livestock Antibiotics Use and Antimicrobial Resistance.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  7. 2002-2022 Quinolone Resistance inVeterinary sciences · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Prevalence of Antibiotic-ResistantAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ping ChengHeilongjiang Key Laboratory for Animal Disease Control and Pharmaceutical Development. Faculty of Basic Veterinary Science, College of Veterinary Medicine, Northeast Agricultural University, 600 Changjiang Road, Xiangfang District, Harbin, Heilongjiang, 150030, P.R. China.
Yuqi YangPharmacology Teaching and Research Department, School of Basic Medicine, Guizhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Dongqing Road, University Town, Huaxi District, Guiyang, P.R. China.
Fulei LiHeilongjiang Key Laboratory for Animal Disease Control and Pharmaceutical Development. Faculty of Basic Veterinary Science, College of Veterinary Medicine, Northeast Agricultural University, 600 Changjiang Road, Xiangfang District, Harbin, Heilongjiang, 150030, P.R. China.
Xiaoting LiHeilongjiang Key Laboratory for Animal Disease Control and Pharmaceutical Development. Faculty of Basic Veterinary Science, College of Veterinary Medicine, Northeast Agricultural University, 600 Changjiang Road, Xiangfang District, Harbin, Heilongjiang, 150030, P.R. China.
Haibin LiuHeilongjiang Key Laboratory for Animal Disease Control and Pharmaceutical Development. Faculty of Basic Veterinary Science, College of Veterinary Medicine, Northeast Agricultural University, 600 Changjiang Road, Xiangfang District, Harbin, Heilongjiang, 150030, P.R. China.
Saqib Ali FazilaniHeilongjiang Key Laboratory for Animal Disease Control and Pharmaceutical Development. Faculty of Basic Veterinary Science, College of Veterinary Medicine, Northeast Agricultural University, 600 Changjiang Road, Xiangfang District, Harbin, Heilongjiang, 150030, P.R. China.
Wenxin GuoHeilongjiang Technical Identification Station of Agricultural products and Veterinary Medicine Feed, Harbin, China.
Guofeng XuInflammation & Allergic Diseases Research Unit, Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, 646000, Sichuan, China.
Xiuying ZhangHeilongjiang Key Laboratory for Animal Disease Control and Pharmaceutical Development. Faculty of Basic Veterinary Science, College of Veterinary Medicine, Northeast Agricultural University, 600 Changjiang Road, Xiangfang District, Harbin, Heilongjiang, 150030, P.R. China. zhangxiuying@neau.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2083-8105
Northeast Agricultural University · CNAffiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University · CNGuizhou University · CN

Funding

National 13th Five-Year Key R&D Program Special Project 2016YFD0501302National 13th Five-Year Key R&D Program Special Project 2018YFD0500306
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIt has been demonstrated that swine waste is an important reservoir for resistant genes. Moreover, the bacteria carrying resistant genes and originating from swine feces and wastewater could spread to the external environment. Fluoroquinolones (FQs) are widely used in livestock and poultry for the treatment of bacterial infection. However, resistance to FQs has increased markedly.

resultsIn this study, swine feces and wastewater were sampled from 21 swine farms of seven provinces in China to investigate the prevalence of FQ resistance, including plasmid-mediated fluoroquinolone resistance (PMQR) genes and the occurrence of target mutations. All isolates showed moderate rate of resistance to norfloxacin (43.0%), ciprofloxacin (47.6%), ofloxacin (47.0%) and levofloxacin (38.8%). The percentage of strains resistant to the four FQs antimicrobials was positively correlated with the danofloxacin (DANO) MIC. Among the 74 FQ-resistant isolates, 39 (52.70%) had mutations in gyrA (S83L and D87 to N, Y, G, or H), 21 (28.38%) had mutations in parC (S80I and E84K), 2 (2.70%) had mutations in parE (I355T and L416F), 26 (35.14%) had mutations in marR (D67N and G103S), 1 (1.35%) had mutations in acrR (V29G). While, no mutation was found in gyrB. There were 7 (9.46%) strains carried the qnrS gene, 29 (39.19%) strains carried the oqxAB gene, and 9 (12.16%) strains carried the aac (6')-Ib-cr gene. In addition, the conjugation assays showed that qnrS, oqxAB and aac (6')-Ib-cr could be successfully transferred to E. coli J53 from 4 (57.1%), 20 (69.0%) and 5 (55.6%) donor strains, respectively. There were no qnrA, qnrB, qnrC, qnrD and qepA genes detected.

conclusionThe present study showed that DANO-resistant E. coli strains isolated from swine farms had significant cross-resistance to other four FQs antimicrobials. Further study revealed that the resistance mechanisms of swine-derived E. coli to FQs may be attributable to the occurrence of chromosomal mutations (gyrA, parC, parE, marR and acrR genes double-site or single-site mutation) and the presence of PMQR genes (qnrS, oqxAB and aac (6')-Ib-cr). To the best of our knowledge, one novel mutation marR-D67N was found to be associated with FQ resistance, two mutations parE-L416F and acrR-V29G have never been reported in China.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsDrug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialEscherichia coliFarmsFecesFluoroquinolonesHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMutationPlasmidsPrevalenceSwineWastewaterAnti-Bacterial AgentsFluoroquinolonesWastewaterEscherichia coliFluoroquinolone resistancePMQRSwineTarget mutations

Identifiers

PMID32723358
PMCPMC7388466
OpenAlexW3045891427

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.