Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32723318›Full record

ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2020

Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial of the effectiveness of adding motivational interviewing or stratified vocational advice intervention to usual case management on return to work for people with musculoskeletal disorders. The MI-NAV study.

Britt Elin Øiestad, Fiona Aanesen, Ida Løchting, Kjersti Storheim, Alexander Tingulstad, Tarjei L Rysstad, Milada C Småstuen, Anne Therese Tveter, Gail Sowden, Gwenllian Wynne-Jones and 5 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03871712 (Return to Work for People With Musculoskeletal Disorders), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03871712 nacompletednot on this map

Return to Work for People With Musculoskeletal Disorders: A Randomized Controlled Trial of the Effectiveness of Usual Case Management Compared to Usual Case Management Plus Motivational Interviewing or Stratified Vocational Advice Intervention. The MI-NAV Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorOslo Metropolitan UniversityRan2019 to 2024Enrolled450ConditionsMusculoskeletal Disease, Musculoskeletal PainArmsMotivational interview, Stratified vocational advice
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Britt Elin ØiestadDepartment of Physiotherapy, OsloMet - Oslo Metropolitan University, St. Olavs plass, 0130, Oslo, Norway. brielo@oslomet.no.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0547-9781
Fiona AanesenDepartment of Physiotherapy, OsloMet - Oslo Metropolitan University, St. Olavs plass, 0130, Oslo, Norway.
Ida LøchtingResearch and Communication Unit for MSK Health (FORMI), Oslo University Hospital and Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway.
Kjersti StorheimDepartment of Physiotherapy, Research and Communication Unit for MSK Health (FORMI), Oslo University Hospital, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway.
Alexander TingulstadDepartment of Physiotherapy, OsloMet - Oslo Metropolitan University, St. Olavs plass, 0130, Oslo, Norway.
Tarjei L RysstadDepartment of Physiotherapy, OsloMet - Oslo Metropolitan University, St. Olavs plass, 0130, Oslo, Norway.
Milada C SmåstuenDepartment of Physiotherapy, OsloMet - Oslo Metropolitan University, St. Olavs plass, 0130, Oslo, Norway.
Anne Therese TveterDepartment of Physiotherapy, OsloMet - Oslo Metropolitan University, St. Olavs plass, 0130, Oslo, Norway.
Gail SowdenSchool of Primary, Community & Social Care, Keele University, Keele, UK.
Gwenllian Wynne-JonesFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, School of Primary, Community and Social Care, and School of Nursing and Midwifery, Keele University, Keele, UK.
Egil A ForsGeneral Practice Research Unit, Department of Public Health and Nursing Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway.
Maurits van TulderDepartment Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Rigmor C BergNorwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Nadine E FosterSchool of Primary, Community & Social Care, Keele University, Keele, UK.
Margreth GrotleDepartment of Physiotherapy, OsloMet - Oslo Metropolitan University, St. Olavs plass, 0130, Oslo, Norway.
OsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University · NOKeele University · GBOslo University Hospital · NONewcastle upon Tyne Hospital · GBNorwegian Institute of Public Health · NONorwegian University of Science and Technology · NOVrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NL

Funding

NIHR Research Professorship NIHR-RP-011-015The Research Council of Norway 280431/GE
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLittle research exists on the effectiveness of motivational interviewing (MI) on return to work (RTW) in workers on long term sick leave. The objectives of this study protocol is to describe a randomized controlled trial (RCT) with the objectives to compare the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of usual case management alone with usual case management plus MI or usual case management plus stratified vocational advice intervention (SVAI), on RTW among people on sick leave due to musculoskeletal (MSK) disorders.

methodsA multi-arm RCT with economic evaluation will be conducted in Norway with recruitment of 450 participants aged 18-67 years on 50-100% sick leave for > 7 weeks due to MSK disorders. Participants will be randomized to either usual case management by the Norwegian Labour and Welfare Administration (NAV) alone, usual case management by NAV plus MI, or usual case management by NAV plus SVAI. Trained caseworkers in NAV will give two MI sessions, and physiotherapists will give 1-4 SVAI sessions depending upon risk of long-term sick leave. The primary outcome is the number of sick leave days from randomization to 6 months follow-up. Secondary outcomes are number of sick leave days at 12 months follow-up, time until sustainable RTW (≥4 weeks of at least 50% of their usual working hours) at 12 months, proportions of participants receiving sick leave benefits during 12 months of follow-up, and MSK symptoms influencing health at 12 months. Cost-utility evaluated by the EuroQoL 5D-5L and cost-benefit analyses will be performed. Fidelity of the interventions will be assessed through audio-recordings of approximately 10% of the intervention sessions. DISCUSSION: The results from this RCT will inform stakeholders involved in supporting RTW due to MSK disorders such as staff within NAV and primary health care.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT03871712 registered March 12th 2020.

Indexed as

Motivational InterviewingMusculoskeletal DiseasesAdolescentAdultAgedCase ManagementHumansMiddle AgedNorwayRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicReturn to WorkSick LeaveYoung AdultHealth economicsMotivational interviewingMSK disordersRandomized controlled trialReturn to workSick leaveVocational interventions

Identifiers

PMID32723318
PMCPMC7385885
OpenAlexW3045509221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.