Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32723313›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2020

The pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) consciousness of black college women and the perceived hesitancy of public health institutions to curtail HIV in black women.

Rasheeta Chandler, Shawnika Hull, Henry Ross, Dominique Guillaume, Sudeshna Paul, Nikita Dera, Natalie Hernandez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Assessing Non-Oral PrEP Alternatives Among Young Black Women in the Southern USA.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Rasheeta ChandlerNell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing (NHWSON), Emory University, 1520 Clifton Rd., NE, Atlanta, GA, 30322-4027, USA. r.d.chandler@emory.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2021-6346
Shawnika HullGeorge Washington University, Prevention and Community Health, 1918 F Street NW, Washington, D.C, 20052, USA.
Henry RossUniversity of Rochester, Center for Community Practice, 601 Elmwood Ave, Rochester, NY, 14627, USA.
Dominique GuillaumeNell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing (NHWSON), Emory University, 1520 Clifton Rd., NE, Atlanta, GA, 30322-4027, USA.
Sudeshna PaulNell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing (NHWSON), Emory University, 1520 Clifton Rd., NE, Atlanta, GA, 30322-4027, USA.
Nikita DeraMorehouse School of Medicine, Community Health and Preventive Medicine, 720 Westview Drive, Atlanta, GA, 30310, USA.
Natalie HernandezMorehouse School of Medicine, Community Health and Preventive Medicine, 720 Westview Drive, Atlanta, GA, 30310, USA.

Funding

Substance Use and HIV Prevention Research in Minority Communities Training ProgramR25DA028567 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Julia Lechuga, Torsten Brian Neilands · 2009 to 2026
$5.4M
NIDA NIH HHS R25 DA028567University Research Committee, Emory University 0
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundConsistent use of Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP), a biomedical intervention for HIV seronegative persons, has been shown to significantly decrease HIV acquisition. Black women are a viable population segment to consider for PrEP use as their HIV incidence is overwhelmingly higher than all other women groups.

methodsWe developed and piloted a cultural- and age- appropriate PrEP education intervention to determine Black college women's: 1) perceptions of and receptivity to PrEP use; and 2) preferences for PrEP information delivery.

resultsWe recruited N = 43 Black college women. Most of our sample were sophomore and Juniors of whom identified as heterosexual (83%) and single (67%). Over 50% of young women had never been HIV tested and only 28% had been tested in the last 6 months; however, 100% of the women believed their HIV status was negative. Prior to participating in the study, most Black college women (67%) had not heard about PrEP and were unsure or apprehensive (72%) to initiate PrEP. The Black college women indicated that our educational intervention was extremely helpful (67%) for understanding and learning about PrEP. Post participating in our PrEP education module, regardless of delivery modality, participants reported being likely (62.55-70%) to initiate PrEP in the future.

conclusionsResults indicate that Black college women would strongly consider PrEP when provided with basic knowledge, regardless of delivery modality. Participants also showed greater appreciation for in-person delivery and found it to be significantly more helpful and of greater quality for learning about PrEP; comprehension or perceived usefulness of PrEP-related content was relatively the same between groups. PrEP content delivery -- via in-person or online methods - is contingent on learning style and presentation.

trial registrationThis study has been registered under the ISRCTN Registry as of July 6, 2020. The trial registration number is ISRCTN14792715 . This study was retrospectively registered.

Indexed as

Attitude to HealthConsciousnessAdultAnti-HIV AgentsBlack or African AmericanFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansPre-Exposure ProphylaxisSafe SexYoung AdultAnti-HIV AgentsBlack women; online educationCollege studentsHIVPrEP (pre-exposure prophylaxis)Prevention

Identifiers

PMID32723313
PMCPMC7385954

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.