Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32723070›Full record

ArticleUnited European gastroenterology journal2021

Use of complementary and alternative medicine and low quality of life associate with the need for psychological and psychotherapeutic interventions in inflammatory bowel disease.

Maximilian Kutschera, Thomas Waldhör, Hans Peter Gröchenig, Thomas Haas, Heimo Wenzl, Pius Steiner, Robert Koch, Thomas Feichtenschlager, Gerald Eckhardt, Andreas Mayer and 15 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in United European gastroenterology journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Psychological interventions for treatment of inflammatory bowel disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors.

Maximilian Kutschera *Department of Internal Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Thomas Waldhör *Department of Epidemiology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Hans Peter GröchenigDepartment of Internal Medicine, Brothers of St. John of God Hospital St. Veit an der Glan, St. Veit an der Glan, Austria.
Thomas HaasDarmpraxis, Salzburg, Austria.
Heimo WenzlDepartment of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Pius SteinerDepartment of Internal Medicine I, Wels-Grieskirchen Hospital, Wels, Austria.
Robert KochDepartment of Internal Medicine I, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Thomas FeichtenschlagerDepartment of Internal Medicine IV, Rudolfstiftung Hospital, Vienna, Austria.
Gerald EckhardtDepartment of Internal Medicine, Oberpullendorf Hospital, Oberpullendorf, Austria.
Andreas MayerDepartment of Internal Medicine II, Universitätsklinikum St. Pölten, St. Pölten, Austria.
Andreas KirchgattererDepartment of Internal Medicine V, Wels-Grieskirchen Hospital, Grieskirchen, Austria.
Othmar LudwiczekDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hall in Tirol Hospital, Hall in Tirol, Austria.
Reingard PlatzerDepartment of Internal Medicine I, Wiener Neustadt Hospital, Wiener Neustadt, Austria.
Pavol PapayDepartment of Internal Medicine, Franziskus Hospital, Vienna, Austria.
Johanna GartnerDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hanusch Hospital, Vienna, Austria.
Harry FuchssteinerDepartment of Internal Medicine IV, Congregation Hospital Sisters of Charity, Linz, Austria.
Paul-Gerhard PetersDepartment of Internal Medicine, Feldkirch Hospital, Feldkirch, Austria.
Gerhard ReichtDepartment of Internal Medicine II, Brothers of St. John of God Hospital Graz, Graz, Austria.
Gabriele MoserDepartment of Internal Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Clemens DejacoDepartment of Internal Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Harald VogelsangDepartment of Internal Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Christian PrimasDepartment of Internal Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-7632-6742
Gottfried Novacek *Department of Internal Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Wolfgang Miehsler *Department of Internal Medicine, Brothers of St. John of God Hospital Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.
Austrian IBD Study Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPatients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) suffer from various symptoms, impairing their quality of life and often affecting psychosocial issues. This may lead to the need for additional psychological care. This study investigated patients' subjective need for integrated psychosomatic support and psychotherapy and indicators for it. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis is a cross-sectional multicentre study in Austrian IBD patients who were in routine care at 18 IBD outpatient clinics. Patients filled in an anonymous, validated questionnaire (Assessment of the Demand for Additional Psychological Treatment Questionnaire [ADAPT]) assessing the need for psychological care. The ADAPT gives two separate scores: the need for integrated psychosomatic support and for psychotherapy. In addition, health-related quality of life and the use of complementary and alternative medicine as well as clinical and socio-demographic variables were queried. Multivariable regression analysis was performed to estimate the effect of the previously mentioned variables on the need for additional psychological care.

resultsOf 1286 patients, 29.7% expressed a need for additional psychological care, 19.6% expressed a need for integrated psychosomatic support and 20.2% expressed a need for psychotherapy. In the multivariable analysis, the two strongest indicators for the need for both types of psychological care were the use of complementary and alternative medicine (for integrated psychosomatic support: odds ratio = 1.64, 95% confidence interval 1.13-2.39, p = 0.010; for psychotherapy: odds ratio = 1.74, 95% confidence interval 1.20-2.53, p = 0.004), and a low health-related quality of life score (for integrated psychosomatic support: odds ratio = 0.95, 95% confidence interval 0.94-0.96, p < 0.001; for psychotherapy: odds ratio = 0.96, 95% confidence interval 0.94-0.97, p < 0.001). DISCUSSION: About 30% of the Austrian IBD patients expressed a need for integrated psychosomatic support and/or psychotherapy. The most important indicators for this need were the use of complementary and alternative medicine and low quality of life.

Indexed as

Complementary TherapiesPsychotherapyQuality of LifeAdolescentAdultAnxietyAustriaCross-Sectional StudiesDepressionFemaleHumansInflammatory Bowel DiseasesMaleMiddle AgedPsychosocial Support SystemsRegression Analysiscrohn's diseasegastroenterologyIBDinflammatory bowel diseaseulcerative colitis

Identifiers

PMID32723070
PMCPMC8259281

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.