Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32723026›Full record

ArticleGlobal health action2020

Exploring national human resource profile and trends of Prosthetists/Orthotists in South Africa from 2002 to 2018.

Luphiwo Mduzana, Ritika Tiwari, Ned Lieketseng, Usuf Chikte

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global health action, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Luphiwo MduzanaDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Walter Sisulu University , Mthatha, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-1595-9340
Ritika TiwariDivision of Health Systems and Public Health, Department of Global Health, Stellenbosch University , Stellenbosch, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-5078-8989
Ned LieketsengCentre for Rehabilitation Studies, Department of Global Health, Stellenbosch University , Stellenbosch, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0001-9844-7828
Usuf ChikteDivision of Health Systems and Public Health, Department of Global Health, Stellenbosch University , Stellenbosch, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-7985-2278

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe World Health Organization (WHO) in 2017 estimated that around 35-40 million people require prosthetic or orthotic services. The Framework and Strategy for Disability and Rehabilitation 2015-2030 for South Africa highlights a shortage of human resources for disability and rehabilitation services to manage the various risks and types of impairments faced by the population.

objectiveTo describe the demographic trends of Prosthetists/Orthotists (P/O) registered with the Health Professions Council of South Africa (HPCSA) from 2002 to 2018.

methodsThe study was a retrospective record-based review of the Health Professions Council of South Africa (HPCSA) database from 2002 until 2018. The database of registered Prosthetists/Orthotists was obtained from the HPCSA.

resultsData were analysed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS version 22.0). In 2018, there were 544 P/Os registered with the HPCSA with a ratio of 0.09 P/Os per 10,000 population. There has been an average annual increase of 6% from 2002 to 2018. The majority (71.9%) of P/Os are located in the more densely populated and urbanized provinces, namely Gauteng, KwaZulu-Natal and Western Cape. The majority of registered P/Os identified as white (61%) followed by Black (22%), Indian (7%) and Coloured (2%). Most of registered P/Os are under the age of 40 years (54.2%) and males make up 73% of the registered P/Os.

conclusionThis study highlights the unequal spatial distribution trends of P/Os which could be accounted for by South Africa's apartheid history and the subsequent slow pace of transformation. Addressing the existing shortages is necessary to expand access to P/Os services and to ensure the motivation, planning and provision of adequate infrastructure to provide these services. The study presents a compelling case for the prioritization and strengthening of this workforce for the achievement of effective universal health coverage for persons with disabilities.

Indexed as

Allied Health PersonnelWorkforceAdultDelivery of Health CareFemaleHumansMalePersons with DisabilitiesRetrospective StudiesSocioeconomic FactorsSouth AfricaDemographicshuman resourcesProsthetists/OrthotistsrehabilitationSouth Africa

Identifiers

PMID32723026
PMCPMC7480577

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.