Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32722721›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

"Something that actually works": Cannabis use among young people in the context of street entrenchment.

Braedon Paul, Madison Thulien, Rod Knight, M J Milloy, Ben Howard, Scarlett Nelson, Danya Fast

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
10.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Digital interventions for substance use disorders in young people: rapid review.Substance abuse treatment, prevention, and policy · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Recommended Academic Reading (RAR).Journal of the Canadian Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry = Journal de l'Academie canadienne de psychiatrie de l'enfant et de l'adolescent · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Braedon PaulDepartment of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3205-6717
Madison ThulienBritish Columbia Centre on Substance Use, Vancouver, Canada.
Rod KnightDepartment of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1464-1584
M J MilloyDepartment of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Ben HowardBritish Columbia Centre on Substance Use, Vancouver, Canada.
Scarlett NelsonBritish Columbia Centre on Substance Use, Vancouver, Canada.
Danya FastDepartment of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
University of British Columbia · CABritish Columbia Centre on Substance Use · CA

Funding

CIHR PJT-153239
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCannabis is one of the most widely used substances among vulnerable young people (<26 years of age) experiencing street entrenchment. Although previous research has documented the role cannabis can play in harm reduction, substance use and mental health treatment and pain management, this research has predominantly been quantitative and focused on adult drug-using populations. Little qualitative work has examined how young people who use drugs understand, experience, and engage with cannabis in the context of street entrenchment and drug use trajectories that include the use of other substances such as alcohol, opioids and crystal methamphetamine (meth).

methodsSemi-structured, in-depth qualitative interviews were conducted between 2017 and 2019 with 56 young people recruited from a cohort of street-involved youth in Vancouver, Canada. We also conducted 13 interviews with 12 youth-focused care providers across the same time period. Interview data were triangulated by drawing on the findings of a program of anthropological research conducted by the senior author since 2008. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and thematic analysis was conducted.

resultsThe vast majority of study participants engaged in daily, intensive cannabis use at the same time as they cycled on and off other substances that were perceived as much more harmful (primarily alcohol, fentanyl, heroin and meth). While most participants derived significant pleasure from the use of cannabis, no participants in our study described using cannabis for purely recreational purposes. A number of participants explicitly framed cannabis as a form of mental health and substance use treatment that was more effective and "healthier" than the long-term use of psychopharmaceuticals and medication-assisted substance use treatment (e.g., opioid agonist therapies). Cannabis use was also understood to ameliorate some of the harms of, or even facilitate transitions out of, periods of street-based homelessness. While the majority of our participants highlighted the positive effects of regular cannabis consumption, some described how intensive cannabis use could generate significant harms.

conclusionIn the context of the recent legalization of non-medical cannabis use in Canada and amid ongoing overdose and housing crises, it is imperative that future policy and programming interventions and provider education and training be responsive to the ways in which vulnerable youth in our setting are actively using cannabis to navigate their everyday lives and healthcare needs.

Indexed as

AdolescentAnalgesics, OpioidDrug UsersFemaleHarm ReductionHumansIll-Housed PersonsInterviews as TopicMaleMental HealthSubstance-Related DisordersYoung AdultAnalgesics, Opioid

Identifiers

PMID32722721
PMCPMC7386570
OpenAlexW3045883804

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.