Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32722712›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Changes in the vaginal microbiota following antibiotic treatment for Mycoplasma genitalium, Chlamydia trachomatis and bacterial vaginosis.

Peter Ahrens, Lee O'Brien Andersen, Berit Lilje, Thor Bech Johannesen, Ebba Gomez Dahl, Sharmin Baig, Jørgen Skov Jensen, Lars Falk

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Vaginal microbiota stability over 18 months in young student women in France.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2024
    Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The Vaginal Microbiome and Reproductive Health in Adolescents and Adults.Journal of pediatric and adolescent gynecology · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The activity of cell-free supernatant ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Peter AhrensDepartment of Bacteriology, Parasitology and Mycology, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-3776-7929
Lee O'Brien AndersenDepartment of Bacteriology, Parasitology and Mycology, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Berit LiljeDepartment of Bacteriology, Parasitology and Mycology, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Thor Bech JohannesenDepartment of Bacteriology, Parasitology and Mycology, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Ebba Gomez DahlDepartment of Bacteriology, Parasitology and Mycology, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Sharmin BaigDepartment of Bacteriology, Parasitology and Mycology, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Jørgen Skov JensenDepartment of Bacteriology, Parasitology and Mycology, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-7464-7435
Lars FalkDepartment of Dermatovenereology, Linköping University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden.
Statens Serum Institut · DKLinköping University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The human vagina harbor a rich microbiota. The optimal state is dominated by lactobacilli that help to maintain health and prevent various diseases. However, the microbiota may rapidly change to a polymicrobial state that has been linked to a number of diseases. In the present study, the temporal changes of the vaginal microbiota in patients treated for sexually transmitted diseases or bacterial vaginosis (BV) and in untreated controls were studied for 26 days. The patients included 52 women treated with azithromycin, tetracyclines or moxifloxacin for present or suspected infection with Chlamydia trachomatis or Mycoplasma genitalium. Women with concurrent BV were also treated with metronidazole. The controls were 10 healthy women of matching age. The microbiota was analyzed by 16S rRNA gene deep sequencing, specific qPCRs and microscopy. There was generally good correlation between Nugent score and community state type (CST) and qPCR confirmed the sequencing results. By sequencing, more than 600 different taxa were found, but only 33 constituted more than 1 ‰ of the sequences. In both patients and controls the microbiota could be divided into three different community state types, CST-I, CST-III and CST-IV. Without metronidazole, the microbiota remained relatively stable regarding CST although changes were seen during menstrual periods. Administration of metronidazole changed the microbiota from CST-IV to CST-III in approximately 50% of the treated patients. In contrast, the CST was generally unaffected by azithromycin or tetracyclines. In 30% of the BV patients, Gardnerella vaginalis was not eradicated by metronidazole. The majority of women colonized with Ureaplasma parvum remained positive after azithromycin while U. urealyticum was eradicated.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsChlamydia InfectionsChlamydia trachomatisFemaleGardnerella vaginalisGram-Positive Bacterial InfectionsHumansMicrobiotaMiddle AgedMycoplasma genitaliumMycoplasma InfectionsVaginaVaginosis, BacterialYoung AdultAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID32722712
PMCPMC7386580
OpenAlexW3045851146

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.