Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32722552›Full record

ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Screen-Printed Electrodes (SPE) for In Vitro Diagnostic Purpose.

Nicolae-Bogdan Mincu, Veronica Lazar, Dana Stan, Carmen Marinela Mihailescu, Rodica Iosub, Andreea Lorena Mateescu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nicolae-Bogdan MincuDepartment of Botany and Microbiology, Faculty of Biology, University of Bucharest, 060101 Bucharest, Romania.
Veronica LazarDepartment of Botany and Microbiology, Faculty of Biology, University of Bucharest, 060101 Bucharest, Romania.
Dana StanDDS Diagnostic, 032032 Bucharest, Romania.
Carmen Marinela MihailescuDDS Diagnostic, 032032 Bucharest, Romania.
Rodica IosubDDS Diagnostic, 032032 Bucharest, Romania.
Andreea Lorena MateescuDDS Diagnostic, 032032 Bucharest, Romania.

Funding

Co-funded by DDS DIAGNOSTIC 925/2019INTELBIOMED PROJECT 52/2016 (MySMIS: 105631)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to rapidly spreading infectious diseases and the high incidence of other diseases such as cancer or metabolic syndrome, there is a continuous need for the development of rapid and accurate diagnosis methods. Screen-printed electrodes-based biosensors have been reported to offer reliable results, with high sensitivity and selectivity and, in some cases, low detection limits. There are a series of materials (carbon, gold, platinum, etc.) used for the manufacturing of working electrodes. Each version comes with advantages, as well as challenges for their functionalization. Thus, the aim is to review the most promising biosensors developed using screen-printed electrodes for the detection/quantification of proteins, biomarkers, or pathogenic microorganisms.

Indexed as

biosensorsdiagnosisscreen-printed electrodes

Identifiers

PMID32722552
PMCPMC7460409

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.