ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2020
Concomitant Infection of
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prevalence of intestinal parasites and Helicobacter pylori co-infection in people with gastrointestinal symptoms in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC infectious diseases · 2025Pooled it
- Prevalence and factors associated with helicobacter pylori positivity among patients with gastritis in an endemic region of Pakistan.SAGE open medicine · 2026Article
- Risk factors for co-infections of helicobacter pylori and intestinal parasites: a cross-sectional study.GMS hygiene and infection control · 2026Article
- Prevalence ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Occurrence ofHeliyon · 2025Article
- Host gastric corpus microenvironment facilitates Ascaris suum larval hatching and infection in a murine model.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
background
methodsThis was a case-control study. Screening for
resultsSixty-one out of 93 patients (66%) were positive to
conclusionOur data suggested that
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.