Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32722077›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2020

An Energy Efficient Routing Approach for IoT Enabled Underwater WSNs in Smart Cities.

Nighat Usman, Omar Alfandi, Saeeda Usman, Asad Masood Khattak, Muhammad Awais, Bashir Hayat, Ahthasham Sajid

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nighat UsmanDepartment of Computer Sciences, Bahria University, Lahore 54000, Pakistan.
Omar AlfandiCollege of Technological Innovation, Zayed University, Abu Dhabi 144534, UAE.
Saeeda UsmanDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, COMSATS University Islamabad, Sahiwal 57000, Pakistan.
Asad Masood KhattakCollege of Technological Innovation, Zayed University, Abu Dhabi 144534, UAE.
Muhammad AwaisSchool of Computing and Communications, Lancaster University, Bailrigg, Lancaster LA1 4YW, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7064-6796
Bashir HayatDepartment of Computer Science, Institute of Management Sciences Peshawar, Peshawar 25000, Pakistan.
Ahthasham SajidDepartment of Computer Science, Faculty of ICT, Balochistan University of Information Technology Engineering and Management Sciences Quetta, Quetta 87300, Balochistan, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0002-2829-0893

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nowadays, there is a growing trend in smart cities. Therefore, Terrestrial and Internet of Things (IoT) enabled Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks (TWSNs and IoT-UWSNs) are mostly used for observing and communicating via smart technologies. For the sake of collecting the desired information from the underwater environment, multiple acoustic sensors are deployed with limited resources, such as memory, battery, processing power, transmission range, etc. The replacement of resources for a particular node is not feasible due to the harsh underwater environment. Thus, the resources held by the node needs to be used efficiently to improve the lifetime of a network. In this paper, to support smart city vision, a terrestrial based "Away Cluster Head with Adaptive Clustering Habit" (ACH) 2 is examined in the specified three dimensional (3-D) region inside the water. Three different cases are considered, which are: single sink at the water surface, multiple sinks at water surface,, and sinks at both water surface and inside water. "Underwater (ACH) 2 " (U-(ACH) 2 ) is evaluated in each case. We have used depth in our proposed U-(ACH) 2 to examine the performance of (ACH) 2 in the ocean environment. Moreover, a comparative analysis is performed with state of the art routing protocols, including: Depth-based Routing (DBR) and Energy Efficient Depth-based Routing (EEDBR) protocol. Among all of the scenarios followed by case 1 and case 3, the number of packets sent and received at sink node are maximum using DEEC-(ACH) 2 protocol. The packets drop ratio using TEEN-(ACH) 2 protocol is less when compared to other algorithms in all scenarios. Whereas, for dead nodes DEEC-(ACH) 2 , LEACH-(ACH) 2 , and SEP-(ACH) 2 protocols' performance is different for every considered scenario. The simulation results shows that the proposed protocols outperform the existing ones.

Indexed as

acoustic signalsclusteringIoTnodesrouting protocolssmart citiesunderwaterwireless sensor networks

Identifiers

PMID32722077
PMCPMC7436233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.