Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32722010›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2020

Impact of a Topical Anaesthesia Wound Management Formulation on Pain, Inflammation and Reduction of Secondary Infections after Tail Docking in Lambs.

Luis Miguel Ferrer, Delia Lacasta, Aurora Ortín, Juan José Ramos, María Teresa Tejedor, Marta Borobia, María Pérez, Enrique Castells, Marta Ruiz de Arcaute, Héctor Ruiz and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Anaemia in Lambs Caused byAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Luis Miguel FerrerAnimal Pathology Department, Instituto Agroalimentario de Aragón-IA2, Veterinary Faculty of Zaragoza, Universidad de Zaragoza-CITA, C/Miguel Servet 177, 50013 Zaragoza, Spain.
Delia LacastaAnimal Pathology Department, Instituto Agroalimentario de Aragón-IA2, Veterinary Faculty of Zaragoza, Universidad de Zaragoza-CITA, C/Miguel Servet 177, 50013 Zaragoza, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-7822-6646
Aurora OrtínAnimal Pathology Department, Instituto Agroalimentario de Aragón-IA2, Veterinary Faculty of Zaragoza, Universidad de Zaragoza-CITA, C/Miguel Servet 177, 50013 Zaragoza, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0313-5926
Juan José RamosAnimal Pathology Department, Instituto Agroalimentario de Aragón-IA2, Veterinary Faculty of Zaragoza, Universidad de Zaragoza-CITA, C/Miguel Servet 177, 50013 Zaragoza, Spain.
María Teresa TejedorAnatomy, Embryology and Animal Genetics Department, Veterinary Faculty of Zaragoza, CIBER CV, Universidad de Zaragoza-IIS, C/Miguel Servet 177, 50013 Zaragoza, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5026-5144
Marta BorobiaAnimal Pathology Department, Instituto Agroalimentario de Aragón-IA2, Veterinary Faculty of Zaragoza, Universidad de Zaragoza-CITA, C/Miguel Servet 177, 50013 Zaragoza, Spain.
María PérezAnimal Pathology Department, Instituto Agroalimentario de Aragón-IA2, Veterinary Faculty of Zaragoza, Universidad de Zaragoza-CITA, C/Miguel Servet 177, 50013 Zaragoza, Spain.
Enrique CastellsCentro Clínico Veterinario, C/Madre Genoveva Torres Morales 8, 50006 Zaragoza, Spain.
Marta Ruiz de ArcauteAnimal Pathology Department, Instituto Agroalimentario de Aragón-IA2, Veterinary Faculty of Zaragoza, Universidad de Zaragoza-CITA, C/Miguel Servet 177, 50013 Zaragoza, Spain.
Héctor RuizAnimal Pathology Department, Instituto Agroalimentario de Aragón-IA2, Veterinary Faculty of Zaragoza, Universidad de Zaragoza-CITA, C/Miguel Servet 177, 50013 Zaragoza, Spain.
Peter Andrew WindsorSydney School of Veterinary Science, The University of Sydney, Camden, NSW 2570, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5629-3517
Universidad de Zaragoza · ESThe University of Sydney · AU

Funding

Aragón Government A15_17R, Construyendo Aragón 2016-20
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We examined several procedures for surgical tail docking; with and without general anaesthesia (GA), including the use of a topical wound gel formulation to provide pain relief (PR) and improve healing after surgery, containing local anaesthetics lignocaine and bupivacaine, with cetrimide and adrenalin. Forty-four lambs were recruited into four equal cohorts: Groups A and C, the tail was excised with a scalpel without anaesthesia or stitches; Groups B and D, the tail was surgically excised and stitched under GA; Groups C and D wounds were immediately sprayed with PR. Behavioural observations identified that Groups A and C displayed significantly less pain-related behaviours than Groups B and D shortly after the procedure, especially if treated with PR. Similarly, the mean of days when animals showed no signs of wound infection was longer in the groups not undergoing stitching. Finally, treatment with PR appeared to reduce the cortisol response and avoided the elevation of serum amyloid A in lambs where the tail was excised without general anaesthesia. In conclusion, surgical tail-docking without GA but where wounds are immediately sprayed with PR, appears as an affordable and more welfare-appropriate method for conducting tail docking in lambs.

Indexed as

cortisollambspain responseserum amyloid Atail dockingwound infection

Identifiers

PMID32722010
PMCPMC7459688
OpenAlexW3044503069

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.