Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32721955›Full record

Observational studyNeuroendocrinology2021

A Plasma Protein Biomarker Strategy for Detection of Small Intestinal Neuroendocrine Tumors.

Magnus Kjellman, Ulrich Knigge, Staffan Welin, Espen Thiis-Evensen, Henning Gronbaek, Camilla Schalin-Jäntti, Halfdan Sorbye, Maiken Thyregod Joergensen, Viktor Johanson, Saara Metso and 9 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Neuroendocrinology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02630654 (Exploratory, Non-Interventional Study For Evaluating The Diagnostic, Prognostic And Response-Predictive Value Of A Multi Biomarker Approach In Metastatic GEP NETs), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02630654 completednot on this map

Exploratory, Non-Interventional Study For Evaluating The Diagnostic, Prognostic And Response-Predictive Value Of A Multi Biomarker Approach In Metastatic GEP NETs

TypeobservationalSponsorIpsenRan2014 to 2021Enrolled404ConditionsGastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine TumorsArmsThis is a non-interventional study. Patients will be treated with any intervention deemed appropriate by the patient's physician.
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 19 institutions in 5 countries.

Magnus KjellmanEndocrine Surgery Unit, Karolinska Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden, magnus.kjellman@ki.se.
Ulrich KniggeDepartment of Endocrinology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, ENETS Neuroendocrine Tumor Centre of Excellence, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Staffan WelinDepartment of Endocrine Oncology, ENETS Neuroendocrine Tumor Centre of Excellence, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden.
Espen Thiis-EvensenDepartment of Gastroenterology, ENETS Neuroendocrine Tumor Centre of Excellence, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.
Henning GronbaekDepartment of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, ENETS Neuroendocrine Tumor Centre of Excellence, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Camilla Schalin-JänttiDepartment of Endocrinology, Abdominal Center, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Halfdan SorbyeDepartment of Oncology and Department of Clinical Science, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Maiken Thyregod JoergensenDepartment of Medical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Viktor JohansonDepartment of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences at the Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Saara MetsoUnit of Endocrinology, Department of Internal Medicine, Tampere University Hospital, Teiskontie Tampere, Tampere, Finland.
Helge WaldumSt. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.
Jon Arne SøreideDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.
Tapani EbelingFaculty of Medicine, University of Oulu, Finland and Division of Endocrinology, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland.
Fredrik LindbergDepartment of Surgery, Norrland University Hospital, Umeå, Sweden.
Kalle LanderholmDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University and Department of Surgery, Ryhov County Hospital, Jönköping, Sweden.
Goran WallinFaculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University Hospital, Örebro, Sweden.
Farhad SalemSkånes University Hospital, Unit for Endocrine and Sarcoma Surgery, Lund, Sweden.
Maria Del Pilar SchneiderIPSEN Innovation SAS, Les Ulis, France.
Roger BelusaIPSEN, Kista Science Tower, Kista, Sweden.
Aarhus University Hospital · DKHaukeland University Hospital · NOIpsen (France) · FRKarolinska University Hospital · SEKista Photonics Research Center · SELinköping University · SEOdense University Hospital · DKÖrebro University Hospital · SEOslo University Hospital · NOOulu University Hospital · FISkåne University Hospital · SEStavanger University Hospital · NOSt Olav's University Hospital · NOTampere University Hospital · FIUniversity Hospital of Umeå · SEUniversity of Copenhagen · DKUniversity of Gothenburg · SEUniversity of Helsinki · FIUppsala University Hospital · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSmall intestinal neuroendocrine tumors (SI-NETs) are difficult to diagnose in the early stage of disease. Current blood biomarkers such as chromogranin A (CgA) and 5-hydroxyindolacetic acid have low sensitivity (SEN) and specificity (SPE). This is a first preplanned interim analysis (Nordic non-interventional, prospective, exploratory, EXPLAIN study [NCT02630654]). Its objective is to investigate if a plasma protein multi-biomarker strategy can improve diagnostic accuracy (ACC) in SI-NETs.

methodsAt the time of diagnosis, before any disease-specific treatment was initiated, blood was collected from patients with advanced SI-NETs and 92 putative cancer-related plasma proteins from 135 patients were analyzed and compared with the results of age- and sex-matched controls (n = 143), using multiplex proximity extension assay and machine learning techniques.

resultsUsing a random forest model including 12 top ranked plasma proteins in patients with SI-NETs, the multi-biomarker strategy showed SEN and SPE of 89 and 91%, respectively, with negative predictive value (NPV) and positive predictive value (PPV) of 90 and 91%, respectively, to identify patients with regional or metastatic disease with an area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUROC) of 99%. In 30 patients with normal CgA concentrations, the model provided a diagnostic SPE of 98%, SEN of 56%, and NPV 90%, PPV of 90%, and AUROC 97%, regardless of proton pump inhibitor intake.

conclusionThis interim analysis demonstrates that a multi-biomarker/machine learning strategy improves diagnostic ACC of patients with SI-NET at the time of diagnosis, especially in patients with normal CgA levels. The results indicate that this multi-biomarker strategy can be useful for early detection of SI-NETs at presentation and conceivably detect recurrence after radical primary resection.

Indexed as

BiomarkersDuodenal NeoplasmsHumansIleal NeoplasmsJejunal NeoplasmsMachine LearningNeuroendocrine TumorsBiomarkersBiomarkerDiagnosisMachine learningNeuroendocrine tumor

Identifiers

PMID32721955
PMCPMC8686712
OpenAlexW3045570200

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.