Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32721847›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in genetics & development2020

Generations of genomes: advances in paleogenomics technology and engagement for Indigenous people of the Americas.

Krystal S Tsosie, Rene L Begay, Keolu Fox, Nanibaa' A Garrison

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in genetics & development, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Ethical Guidance in Human Paleogenomics: New and Ongoing Perspectives.Annual review of genomics and human genetics · 2022
    Review
  13. Ancient and modern genomics of the Ohlone Indigenous population of California.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Krystal S TsosieVanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37325, USA; Native BioData Consortium, Eagle Butte, SD 57625, USA.
Rene L BegayCenters for American Indian and Alaska Native Health, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, USA.
Keolu FoxDepartment of Anthropology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA; Department of Global Health, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA; Indigenous Futures Lab, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA; Native BioData Consortium, Eagle Butte, SD 57625, USA.
Nanibaa' A GarrisonInstitute for Society and Genetics, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA; Institute for Precision Health, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA; General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA. Electronic address: nanibaa@socgen.ucla.edu.
Native Health · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USUniversity of California San Diego · USVanderbilt University · US

Funding

Research CoresP20GM103442 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NORTH DAKOTA · PI Chris Jurgens · 2012 to 2026
$53.0M
Genomics and Native Communities: Perspectives, Ethics, and EngagementK01HG008818 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI GARRISON, NANIBAA' A · 2016 to 2020
$819k
NHGRI NIH HHS K01 HG008818NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103442
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For decades, scientists have collected genomic information from Indigenous peoples and their ancestors with the goal of elucidating human migration events, understanding ancestral origins, and identifying ancestral variants contributing to disease. However, such studies may not have offered much benefit to the Indigenous groups who contributed DNA, and many have instead perpetuated stereotypes and other harms. With recent advances in genomic technology facilitating the study of both ancient and present-day DNA, researchers and Indigenous communities have new opportunities to begin collaboratively addressing important questions about human health and history. Yet, while there are increased efforts to ethically engage Indigenous communities, more work is still needed as the discipline struggles to absolve itself of the racialized science and extractive biocolonialism that defined its past.

Indexed as

Genome, HumanHuman MigrationPaleontologyGenomicsHumansIndigenous PeoplesPopulation GroupsUnited States

Identifiers

PMID32721847
PMCPMC7484015
OpenAlexW3045470120

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.