Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32721510›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2020

Individual differences in haemoglobin concentration influence bold fMRI functional connectivity and its correlation with cognition.

Phillip G D Ward, Edwina R Orchard, Stuart Oldham, Aurina Arnatkevičiūtė, Francesco Sforazzini, Alex Fornito, Elsdon Storey, Gary F Egan, Sharna D Jamadar

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Human cerebral cortex organization characterized by functional PET-FDG "Metabolic Connectivity".European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Protective role of parenthood on age-related brain function in mid- to late-life.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Phillip G D WardMonash Biomedical Imaging, Monash University, 770 Blackburn Rd, Melbourne, Victoria 3800, Australia; Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Integrative Brain Function, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. Electronic address: phillipgdward@gmail.com.
Edwina R OrchardMonash Biomedical Imaging, Monash University, 770 Blackburn Rd, Melbourne, Victoria 3800, Australia; Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Integrative Brain Function, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Stuart OldhamTurner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Aurina ArnatkevičiūtėTurner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Francesco SforazziniMonash Biomedical Imaging, Monash University, 770 Blackburn Rd, Melbourne, Victoria 3800, Australia.
Alex FornitoTurner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Elsdon StoreySchool of Public Health and Preventative Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Gary F EganMonash Biomedical Imaging, Monash University, 770 Blackburn Rd, Melbourne, Victoria 3800, Australia; Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Integrative Brain Function, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Sharna D JamadarMonash Biomedical Imaging, Monash University, 770 Blackburn Rd, Melbourne, Victoria 3800, Australia; Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Integrative Brain Function, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. Electronic address: sharna.jamadar@monash.edu.
Monash University · AUAustralian Research Council · AU

Funding

ASPirin in Reducing Events in the ElderlyU01AG029824 · NIA · HENNEPIN HEALTHCARE RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI MCNEIL, JOHN JAMES, MURRAY, ANNE M · 2009 to 2018
$64.6M
Main Administrative CoreU19AG062682 · NIA · HENNEPIN HEALTHCARE RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI MURRAY, ANNE M · 2019 to 2023
$42.9M
NIA NIH HHS U01 AG029824NIA NIH HHS U19 AG062682
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Resting-state connectivity measures the temporal coherence of the spontaneous neural activity of spatially distinct regions, and is commonly measured using BOLD-fMRI. The BOLD response follows neuronal activity, when changes in the relative concentration of oxygenated and deoxygenated haemoglobin cause fluctuations in the MRI T2* signal. Since the BOLD signal detects changes in relative concentrations of oxy/deoxy-haemoglobin, individual differences in haemoglobin levels may influence the BOLD signal-to-noise ratio in a manner independent of the degree of neural activity. In this study, we examined whether group differences in haemoglobin may confound measures of functional connectivity. We investigated whether relationships between measures of functional connectivity and cognitive performance could be influenced by individual variability in haemoglobin. Finally, we mapped the neuroanatomical distribution of the influence of haemoglobin on functional connectivity to determine where group differences in functional connectivity are manifest. In a cohort of 518 healthy elderly subjects (259 men), each sex group was median-split into two groups with high and low haemoglobin concentration. Significant differences were obtained in functional connectivity between the high and low haemoglobin groups for both men and women (Cohen's d 0.17 and 0.03 for men and women respectively). The haemoglobin connectome in males showed a widespread systematic increase in functional connectivity correlation values, whilst the female connectome showed predominantly parietal and subcortical increases and temporo-parietal decreases. Despite the haemoglobin groups having no differences in cognitive measures, significant differences in the linear relationships between cognitive performance and functional connectivity were obtained for all 5 cognitive tests in males, and 4 out of 5 tests in females. Our findings confirm that individual variability in haemoglobin levels that give rise to group differences are an important confounding variable in BOLD-fMRI-based studies of functional connectivity. Controlling for haemoglobin variability as a potentially confounding variable is crucial to ensure the reproducibility of human brain connectome studies, especially in studies that compare groups of individuals, compare sexes, or examine connectivity-cognition relationships.

Indexed as

ConnectomeMagnetic Resonance ImagingAgedAged, 80 and overAgingBrainCognitionFemaleHemoglobinsHumansIndividualityMaleMulticenter Studies as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicHemoglobinsFmriFunctional connectivityFunctional connectomeHaematocritHaemoglobin

Identifiers

PMID32721510
PMCPMC7994014
OpenAlexW3044648820

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.