Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32721379›Full record

ReviewNeuron2020

A M/EEG-fMRI Fusion Primer: Resolving Human Brain Responses in Space and Time.

Radoslaw M Cichy, Aude Oliva

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neuron, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. From retinotopic to ordinal coding: Dissecting the cortical stages of visual word recognition.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Novel Verbal Instructions Recruit Abstract Neural Patterns of Time-Variable Information Dimensionality.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Radoslaw M CichyDepartment of Education and Psychology, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Berlin School of Mind and Brain, Humboldt-Universität Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany; Bernstein Centre for Computational Neuroscience Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany. Electronic address: radoslaw.cichy@fu-berlin.de.
Aude OlivaComputer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA. Electronic address: oliva@mit.edu.

Funding

European Research Council 803370
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Any cognitive function is mediated by a network of many cortical sites whose activity is orchestrated through complex temporal dynamics. To understand cognition, we need to identify brain responses simultaneously in space and time. Here we present a technique that does this by linking multivariate response patterns of the human brain recorded with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and with magneto- or electroencephalography (M/EEG) based on representational similarity. We present the rationale and current applications of this non-invasive analysis technique, termed M/EEG-fMRI fusion, and discuss its pros and cons. We highlight its wide applicability in cognitive neuroscience and how its openness to further development and extension gives it strong potential for a deeper understanding of cognition in the future.

Indexed as

BrainBrain MappingElectroencephalographyHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMagnetoencephalographyMultimodal ImagingNeuroimagingEEGfMRIfusionMEGneural dynamics

Identifiers

PMID32721379
PMCPMC7612024

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.