Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32721134›Full record

ReviewCancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.)2019

Biomarkers of radiation-induced vascular injury.

Bhanu Prasad Venkatesulu, Keith L Sanders, Cheng-En Hsieh, Byung Kyu Kim, Sunil Krishnan

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Necrosis of the Tongue as a Late Complication of Radiotherapy.Iranian journal of otorhinolaryngology · 2023
    Article
  6. Review of the Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, and Management of Osteoradionecrosis of the Femoral Head.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Biomarkers of radiation-induced vascular injury.Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Bhanu Prasad VenkatesuluDepartments of Experimental Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Keith L SandersDepartments of Experimental Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Cheng-En HsiehDepartments of Experimental Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Byung Kyu KimDepartments of Experimental Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Sunil KrishnanDepartments of Experimental Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.ORCID 0000-0002-1340-4771
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveCancer survivorship has thrown the spotlight on the incidence of nonmalignant chronic diseases in cancer patients. Endothelial injury is increasingly recognized as a consequence of cancer treatment, particularly after radiation therapy (RT). This review is to provide a current understanding on the pathophysiological mechanisms and predictive biomarkers of radiation-induced vascular injury. RECENT

findingsRadiation directly impacts vasculature by causing endothelial apoptosis and senescence, and alterations in normal homeostasis. This altered milieu at the endothelial surface may contribute to a systemic chronic inflammatory state that is superimposed upon the cascade of normal senescence processes leading to acceleration of age-related disorders, atherosclerosis, and chronic fibrosis. Vasculature imaging, blood-based or cell-component biomarkers, and signatures of genomics, proteomics, metabolomics, and radiomics are potential tools for detection of vascular damage after irradiation.

conclusionsDevelopment of a valid prediction model by combining an array of imaging tools, blood-based biomarkers, coupled with novel predictors like exosomes and metabolic degradation products can serve to identify RT-induced vascular injury early for subsequent introduction of newer therapeutic approaches to counter radiation morbidity.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiomarkersGenomicsHumansMetabolomicsNeoplasmsRadiation InjuriesVascular System InjuriesBiomarkersaccelerated atherosclerosisbiomarkercytokinesexosomes

Identifiers

PMID32721134
PMCPMC7941417
OpenAlexW2902294716

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.