Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32721059›Full record

ArticleThe oncologist2020

AR-V7 as a Biomarker for Resistance to Treatment with Abiraterone/Enzalutamide in Three Latin American Countries: A Hypothetical Cost-Saving Analysis.

Rafael Adrián Pacheco-Orozco, Lorena Montealegre-Páez, Federico Cayol, Héctor Martínez-Gregorio, Javier Oliver, Cecilia Frecha, Felipe Vaca-Paniagua, Sandra Perdomo

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The oncologist, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.

Rafael Adrián Pacheco-OrozcoInstituto de Investigación en Nutrición, Genética y Metabolismo, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad el Bosque, Bogotá, Colombia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1114-7812
Lorena Montealegre-PáezInstituto de Investigación en Nutrición, Genética y Metabolismo, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad el Bosque, Bogotá, Colombia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5571-6987
Federico CayolSección de Oncología, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9794-2173
Héctor Martínez-GregorioLaboratorio Nacional en Salud: Diagnóstico Molecular y Efecto Ambiental en Enfermedades Crónico-Degenerativas, Facultad de Estudios Superiores Iztacala, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México City, México.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7240-5590
Javier OliverInstituto de Medicina Traslacional e Ingeniería Biomédica, Instituto Universitario Hospital Italiano, Buenos Aires, Argentina.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8073-4711
Cecilia FrechaInstituto de Medicina Traslacional e Ingeniería Biomédica, Instituto Universitario Hospital Italiano, Buenos Aires, Argentina.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6729-2162
Felipe Vaca-PaniaguaLaboratorio Nacional en Salud: Diagnóstico Molecular y Efecto Ambiental en Enfermedades Crónico-Degenerativas, Facultad de Estudios Superiores Iztacala, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México City, México.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2200-9706
Sandra PerdomoInstituto de Investigación en Nutrición, Genética y Metabolismo, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad el Bosque, Bogotá, Colombia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7740-8141
Universidad El Bosque · COCentre International de Recherche sur le Cancer · FRConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas · ARHospital Italiano de Buenos Aires · ARInstituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga · ESInstituto Nacional de Cancerología · MXUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de México · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProstate cancer is the most incident and one of the deadliest male cancers in Latin America. Treatment for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) includes androgen receptor signaling inhibitors such as abiraterone and enzalutamide, for which androgen receptor splice variant 7 (AR-V7) has emerged as a biomarker for primary resistance. Our study sought to analyze the potential economic impact of the use of AR-V7 detection as a treatment indicator in patients with mCRPC in three Latin American countries. MATERIALS AND

methodsA hypothetical cost prediction model for the use of noninvasive circulating tumor cell-based AR-V7 testing as a treatment indicator for patients eligible for treatment with abiraterone/enzalutamide was conducted using available information on treatment and testing costs from Mexico, Argentina, and Colombia.

resultsAt an estimated prevalence of AR-V7 positivity of 20%, the use of upfront AR-V7 genetic testing resulted in annual net savings of $9,801,669.97, $6,390,055.75, and $3,096,780.91 in Mexico, Argentina, and Colombia, respectively. A direct relationship between AR-V7 positivity prevalence and net savings was found.

conclusionThe use of a noninvasive AR-V7 detection assay as a treatment indicator tool in patients eligible for treatment with abiraterone or enzalutamide in Latin America could be a cost-effective approach for the management of these patients. Additional efforts are needed to accurately determine the incidence of castration-resistant prostate cancer cases and the prevalence of AR-V7 positivity in Latin America in order to predict the potential economic benefit of its clinical use. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: In Latin America, prostate cancer is the most frequently diagnosed cancer in men, and the burden of this disease is expected to double in this region by 2030. Noninvasive detection of androgen receptor splice variant 7 (AR-V7) is being currently validated as a predictive biomarker for benefit with androgen receptor signaling inhibitor therapy in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). This hypothetical cost-saving analysis shows that AR-V7 testing in peripheral blood of patients with CRPC eligible for treatment with abiraterone or enzalutamide might represent a cost-effective strategy to select patients who will benefit from AR-axis-directed treatment in three Latin American countries.

Indexed as

Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-ResistantAndrostenesBenzamidesBiomarkersColombiaDrug Resistance, NeoplasmHumansLatin AmericaMaleMexicoNitrilesPhenylthiohydantoinProtein IsoformsReceptors, AndrogenabirateroneAndrostenesBenzamidesBiomarkersenzalutamideNitrilesPhenylthiohydantoinProtein IsoformsReceptors, AndrogenAndrogen receptor antagonistsBiomarkersCost savingsNeoplasm drug resistanceProstatic neoplasmsTherapeutics

Identifiers

PMID32721059
PMCPMC8108055
OpenAlexW3046070456

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.