Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32720758›Full record

ArticleMolecular genetics & genomic medicine2020

Identification of the novel COL5A1 c.3369_3431dup, p.(Glu1124_Gly1144dup) variant in a patient with incomplete classical Ehlers-Danlos syndrome: The importance of phenotype-guided genetic testing.

Marco Ritelli, Valeria Cinquina, Marina Venturini, Marina Colombi

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular genetics & genomic medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Clinical Variability of Classical Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome: A Family with RareInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Marco RitelliDivision of Biology and Genetics, Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7025-2495
Valeria CinquinaDivision of Biology and Genetics, Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1545-4801
Marina VenturiniDivision of Dermatology, Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, Spedali Civili University Hospital, Brescia, Italy.
Marina ColombiDivision of Biology and Genetics, Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3105-5990
University of Brescia · ITAzienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale degli Spedali Civili di Brescia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClassical Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (cEDS) is a connective tissue disorder mainly caused by heterozygous COL5A1 or COL5A2 variants encoding type V collagen and rarely by the p.(Arg312Cys) missense substitution in COL1A1 encoding type I collagen. The current EDS nosology specifies that minimal suggestive criteria are marked skin hyperextensibility plus atrophic scarring together with either generalized joint hypermobility or at least three minor criteria comprising additional cutaneous and articular signs. To reach a final diagnosis, molecular testing is required. Herein, we report on a 3-year-old female who came to our attention with an inconclusive next generation sequencing (NGS) panel comprising all cEDS-associated genes.

methodsDespite the patient did not formally fulfill the nosological criteria because the skin was only slightly hyperextensible, we made a cEDS diagnosis, mainly for the presence of typical atrophic scars. We investigated COL5A1 intragenic deletions/duplications by Multiplex Ligation-dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA), excluded the recessive classical-like EDS type 2 by AEBP1 Sanger analysis, and retested COL5A1 with the Sanger method.

resultsMolecular analyses revealed the novel COL5A1 c.3369_3431dup p.(Glu1124_Gly1144dup) intermediate-sized duplication with a predicted dominant negative effect that was missed both by NGS and MLPA.

conclusionsThis report highlights that some cEDS patients might not display overt skin hyperextensibility and the importance of clinical expertise to make such a diagnosis in patients with an incomplete presentation. Our results also exemplify that NGS is not a fool-proof technology and that Sanger sequencing achieves the diagnostic goal when there is a sufficiently clear phenotypic indication.

Indexed as

PhenotypeCarboxypeptidasesChild, PreschoolCollagen Type VDiagnosis, DifferentialEhlers-Danlos SyndromeFemaleGenetic TestingHumansRepressor ProteinsSkinAEBP1 protein, humanCarboxypeptidasesCOL5A1 protein, humanCollagen Type VRepressor Proteinsatrophic scarsclassical Ehlers-Danlos syndromeCOL5A1next generation sequencingSanger sequencingskin hyperextensibility

Identifiers

PMID32720758
PMCPMC7549590
OpenAlexW3045813464

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.