Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32720598›Full record

ReviewCurrent medicinal chemistry2020

Mengshi Li, Edwin A Sagastume, Dongyoul Lee, Daniel McAlister, Anthony J DeGraffenreid, Keith R Olewine, Stephen Graves, Roy Copping, Saed Mirzadeh, Brian E Zimmerman and 3 more

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current medicinal chemistry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Quantitative Comparison of SPECT and PET Performance for Clinical Theranostic Applications.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography Tracer.Recent results in cancer research. Fortschritte der Krebsforschung. Progres dans les recherches sur le cancer · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Synthesis of DOTA-BasedMethods and protocols · 2025
    Article
  11. DifferentToxics · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Lead-it-EAZY! GMP-compliant production of [EJNMMI radiopharmacy and chemistry · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Immuno-PET Imaging of EGFR withMolecular pharmaceutics · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. First-in-human SPECT/CT imaging of [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Mengshi LiDepartment of Radiology, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52240, United States.
Edwin A SagastumeViewpoint Molecular Targeting, Inc., Coralville, Iowa 52241, United States.
Dongyoul LeeInterdisciplinary Graduate Program in Human Toxicology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52241, United States.
Daniel McAlisterEichrom Technologies, LLC, Lisle, IL 60532, United States.
Anthony J DeGraffenreidLantheus Medical Imaging, North Billerica, MA 01862, United States.
Keith R OlewineLantheus Medical Imaging, North Billerica, MA 01862, United States.
Stephen GravesDepartment of Radiology, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52240, United States.
Roy CoppingOak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge Tennessee 37831, United States.
Saed MirzadehOak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge Tennessee 37831, United States.
Brian E ZimmermanThe National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899, United States.
Roy H LarsenSciencons, AS, Oslo, Norway.
Frances L JohnsonViewpoint Molecular Targeting, Inc., Coralville, Iowa 52241, United States.
Michael K SchultzViewpoint Molecular Targeting, Inc., Coralville, Iowa 52241, United States.
University of Iowa · USViewpoint Molecular Targeting (United States) · USLantheus Medical Imaging (United States) · USOak Ridge National Laboratory · USNational Institute of Standards and Technology · US

Funding

Viral VectorP30CA086862 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI Douglas Robert Spitz · 2000 to 2026
$70.0M
Project 4: New Approaches to Improving the Effectiveness of Radionuclide Targeted Treatments in Neuroendocrine TumorsP50CA174521 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI ODORISIO, THOMAS · 2015 to 2021
$13.2M
Alpha-Particle Emitter Peptide Receptor Targeted Radionuclide Therapy for Neuroendocrine TumorsR01CA243014 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI MENDA, YUSUF · 2019 to 2024
$2.5M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA086862NCI NIH HHS P50 CA174521NCI NIH HHS R01 CA243014
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Receptor-targeted image-guided Radionuclide Therapy (TRT) is increasingly recognized as a promising approach to cancer treatment. In particular, the potential for clinical translation of receptor-targeted alpha-particle therapy is receiving considerable attention as an approach that can improve outcomes for cancer patients. Higher Linear-energy Transfer (LET) of alpha-particles (compared to beta particles) for this purpose results in an increased incidence of double-strand DNA breaks and improved-localized cancer-cell damage. Recent clinical studies provide compelling evidence that alpha-TRT has the potential to deliver a significantly more potent anti-cancer effect compared with beta-TRT. Generator-produced 212Pb (which decays to alpha emitters 212Bi and 212Po) is a particularly promising radionuclide for receptor-targeted alpha-particle therapy. A second attractive feature that distinguishes 212Pb alpha-TRT from other available radionuclides is the possibility to employ elementallymatched isotope 203Pb as an imaging surrogate in place of the therapeutic radionuclide. As direct non-invasive measurement of alpha-particle emissions cannot be conducted using current medical scanner technology, the imaging surrogate allows for a pharmacologically-inactive determination of the pharmacokinetics and biodistribution of TRT candidate ligands in advance of treatment. Thus, elementally-matched 203Pb labeled radiopharmaceuticals can be used to identify patients who may benefit from 212Pb alpha-TRT and apply appropriate dosimetry and treatment planning in advance of the therapy. In this review, we provide a brief history on the use of these isotopes for cancer therapy; describe the decay and chemical characteristics of 203/212Pb for their use in cancer theranostics and methodologies applied for production and purification of these isotopes for radiopharmaceutical production. In addition, a medical physics and dosimetry perspective is provided that highlights the potential of 212Pb for alpha-TRT and the expected safety for 203Pb surrogate imaging. Recent and current preclinical and clinical studies are presented. The sum of the findings herein and observations presented provide evidence that the 203Pb/212Pb theranostic pair has a promising future for use in radiopharmaceutical theranostic therapies for cancer.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsBismuthHumansLead RadioisotopesPrecision MedicineRadioisotopesRadiopharmaceuticalsTissue DistributionBismuthBismuth-212Lead-203Lead-212Lead RadioisotopesRadioisotopesRadiopharmaceuticalscancerdosimetryLead-203Lead-212MIRDPb-203Pb-212radiochemistryradionuclide therapyRadiopharmaceuticalsSPECT imagingtheranosticsvoxel-based dosimetry

Identifiers

PMID32720598
PMCPMC10613023
OpenAlexW3046306988

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.