Commentary on Hilton et al. (2020): Expanding social discourse analysis to gain traction on the broad commercial determinants of health.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Power and Other Commercial Determinants of Health: An Empirical Study of the Australian Food, Alcohol, and Gambling Industries.International journal of health policy and management · 2023
   Article
2. Expanding our understanding of industry opposition to help implement sugar-sweetened beverage taxation.Public health nutrition · 2022
   Article
3. Measuring the Commercial Determinants of Health and Disease: A Proposed Framework.International journal of health services : planning, administration, evaluation · 2022
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Policy congruence and advocacy strategies in the discourse networks of minimum unit pricing for alcohol and the soft drinks industry levy.2020

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as