Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32720256›Full record

ReviewCanadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie2020

Efficacy and safety of decontamination for N95 respirator reuse: a systematic literature search and narrative synthesis.

Benjamin E Steinberg, Kazuyoshi Aoyama, Mark McVey, David Levin, Asad Siddiqui, Farrukh Munshey, Neil M Goldenberg, David Faraoni, Jason T Maynes

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Mask effectiveness against viral illnesses in health care professionals.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. F1000Research · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Benjamin E SteinbergDepartment of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University Ave, Toronto, ON, M5G 1X8, Canada.
Kazuyoshi AoyamaDepartment of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University Ave, Toronto, ON, M5G 1X8, Canada.
Mark McVeyDepartment of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University Ave, Toronto, ON, M5G 1X8, Canada.
David LevinDepartment of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University Ave, Toronto, ON, M5G 1X8, Canada.
Asad SiddiquiDepartment of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University Ave, Toronto, ON, M5G 1X8, Canada.
Farrukh MunsheyDepartment of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University Ave, Toronto, ON, M5G 1X8, Canada.
Neil M GoldenbergDepartment of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University Ave, Toronto, ON, M5G 1X8, Canada.
David FaraoniDepartment of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University Ave, Toronto, ON, M5G 1X8, Canada.
Jason T MaynesDepartment of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University Ave, Toronto, ON, M5G 1X8, Canada. jason.maynes@sickkids.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2050-3620
University of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeUnder times of supply chain stress, the availability of some medical equipment and supplies may become limited. The current pandemic involving severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 has highlighted limitations to the ordinary provision of personal protective equipment (PPE). For perioperative healthcare workers, N95 masks provide a stark example of PPE in short supply necessitating the creation of scientifically valid protocols for their decontamination and reuse.

methodsWe performed a systematic literature search of MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL databases, and ClinicalTrials.gov to identify peer-reviewed articles related to N95 mask decontamination and subsequent testing for the integrity of mask filtration and facial seal. To expand this search, we additionally surveyed the official statements from key health agencies, organizations, and societies for relevant citations.

resultsOur initial database search resulted in five articles that met inclusion criteria, with 26 articles added from the expanded search. Our search did not reveal any relevant randomized clinical trials or cohort studies. We found that moist mask heating (65-80°C at 50-85% relative humidity for 20-30 min) and vaporous hydrogen peroxide treatment were supported by the literature to provide consistent viral decontamination without compromising mask seal and filtration efficiency. Other investigated decontamination methods lacked comprehensive scientific evidence for all three of these key criteria.

conclusionsN95 mask reprocessing using either moist heat or vaporous hydrogen peroxide is recommended to ensure healthcare worker safety.

Indexed as

COVID-19DecontaminationEquipment ReuseFiltrationHealth PersonnelHot TemperatureHumansN95 RespiratorsSARS-CoV-2COVID-19heat inactivationhydrogen peroxide sterilizationN95 cleaning

Identifiers

PMID32720256
PMCPMC7384726
OpenAlexW3045688418

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.