ArticleAcademic psychiatry : the journal of the American Association of Directors of Psychiatric Residency Training and the Association for Academic Psychiatry2020
When Bad Things Happen: Training Medical Students to Anticipate the Aftermath of Medical Errors.
Article in Academic psychiatry : the journal of the American Association of Directors of Psychiatric Residency Training and the Association for Academic Psychiatry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Unveiling the hidden struggle of healthcare students as second victims through a systematic review.BMC medical education · 2024Pooled it
- Doctors' life stories in undergraduate medical education: definition, key concepts and uses - a scoping review.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Preparing Medical Students and Physicians to Cope With Their Medical Errors: A Scoping Review.Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges · 2025Article
- Preparing Trainees to Rebound from Surgical Complications.Current urology reports · 2024Review
- Medical Error: Using Storytelling and Reflection to Impact Resident Error Response Factors.MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources · 2024Article
- Medical students' experiences, perceptions, and management of second victim: an interview study.BMC medical education · 2023Article
- The Relationship between Professional Identity, Performance and Attitude to Medical Errors Self-reporting among Medical Students.Journal of advances in medical education & professionalism · 2023Article
- Medical Error: Using Storytelling and Reflection to Impact Error Response Factors in Family Medicine Residents.Journal of medical education and curricular developmentArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveMedical errors affect trainees. Existing curricula emphasize tenets of patient safety but rarely address the impact of medical errors on health care providers, particularly at the undergraduate level. The authors developed an interactive session exploring the professional and personal effects of medical errors for 300 second-year medical students.
methodsThe session utilized case-based learning, small group discussion, and video vignettes. Physicians in multiple specialties were interviewed, sharing narrative accounts of their experience with medical errors and adverse events. Discussions were facilitated by local physicians, who delivered content and shared personal anecdotes. Surveys using a 5-point Likert scale were conducted before and after the session.
resultsPre- and post-test surveys resulted in 91 responses in 2016 and 174 in 2017. In 2016, results showed significant change in student responses by 0.34 units (SD 0.35 units; p < 0.001). Two survey items addressing student awareness and three items addressing confidence were significant. The domains assessing students' attitudes and knowledge regarding medical errors were not significant. In 2017, the overall mean change was 0.33 with a lower standard error, 0.03 (p < 0.001), showing significance in both years the session was delivered.
conclusionA 1-h, small-group session increased medical students' understanding of the impact of medical errors and adverse events on providers and the supportive resources available. Recruitment of local faculty to facilitate discussions and share personal anecdotes enhanced the success of the session.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.