Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32720210›Full record

ArticleAcademic psychiatry : the journal of the American Association of Directors of Psychiatric Residency Training and the Association for Academic Psychiatry2020

When Bad Things Happen: Training Medical Students to Anticipate the Aftermath of Medical Errors.

Swapna Musunur, Eva Waineo, Edward Walton, Kathryn Deeds, Diane Levine

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Academic psychiatry : the journal of the American Association of Directors of Psychiatric Residency Training and the Association for Academic Psychiatry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Preparing Medical Students and Physicians to Cope With Their Medical Errors: A Scoping Review.Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Medical Error: Using Storytelling and Reflection to Impact Resident Error Response Factors.MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Swapna MusunurWayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, USA. smusunur@med.wayne.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4258-7439
Eva WaineoWayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, USA.
Edward WaltonWayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, USA.
Kathryn DeedsWayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, USA.
Diane LevineWayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveMedical errors affect trainees. Existing curricula emphasize tenets of patient safety but rarely address the impact of medical errors on health care providers, particularly at the undergraduate level. The authors developed an interactive session exploring the professional and personal effects of medical errors for 300 second-year medical students.

methodsThe session utilized case-based learning, small group discussion, and video vignettes. Physicians in multiple specialties were interviewed, sharing narrative accounts of their experience with medical errors and adverse events. Discussions were facilitated by local physicians, who delivered content and shared personal anecdotes. Surveys using a 5-point Likert scale were conducted before and after the session.

resultsPre- and post-test surveys resulted in 91 responses in 2016 and 174 in 2017. In 2016, results showed significant change in student responses by 0.34 units (SD 0.35 units; p < 0.001). Two survey items addressing student awareness and three items addressing confidence were significant. The domains assessing students' attitudes and knowledge regarding medical errors were not significant. In 2017, the overall mean change was 0.33 with a lower standard error, 0.03 (p < 0.001), showing significance in both years the session was delivered.

conclusionA 1-h, small-group session increased medical students' understanding of the impact of medical errors and adverse events on providers and the supportive resources available. Recruitment of local faculty to facilitate discussions and share personal anecdotes enhanced the success of the session.

Indexed as

Education, Medical, UndergraduateStudents, MedicalCurriculumHumansMedical ErrorsPatient SafetyBurnoutMedical errorReflectionSmall group learningUndergraduate medical education

Identifiers

PMID32720210
PMCPMC7384728

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.