ArticlePlanta2020
Transcriptomic variation of the flower-fruit transition in Physalis and Solanum.
Article in Planta, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Heterometric expression of an LBD gene via LBD-TCP assembly regulates floral organ size and fruit weight in Physalis.Horticulture research · 2025Article
- Advances inFrontiers in plant science · 2024Review
- Establishing Physalis as a Solanaceae model system enables genetic reevaluation of the inflated calyx syndrome.The Plant cell · 2023Article
- Multiple and integrated functions of floral C-class MADS-box genes in flower and fruit development of Physalis floridana.Plant molecular biology · 2021Article
- Integrating Omics and Gene Editing Tools for Rapid Improvement of Traditional Food Plants for Diversified and Sustainable Food Security.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
MAIN
conclusionGene expression variations in response to fertilization between Physalis and Solanum might play essential roles in species divergence and fruit evolution. Fertilization triggers variation in fruit development and morphology. The Chinese lantern, a morphological novelty derived from the calyx, is formed upon fertilization in Physalis but is not observed in Solanum. The underlying genetic variations are largely unknown. Here, we documented the developmental and morphological differences in the flower and fruit between Physalis floridana and Solanum pimpinellifolium and then evaluated both the transcript sequence variation and gene expression at the transcriptomic level at fertilization between the two species. In Physalis transcriptomic analysis, 468 unigenes were identified as differentially expressed genes (DEGs) that were strongly regulated by fertilization across 3 years. In comparison with tomato, 14,536 strict single-copy orthologous gene pairs were identified between P. floridana and S. pimpinellifolium in the flower-fruit transcriptome. Nine types of gene variations with specific GO-enriched patterns were identified, covering 58.82% orthologous gene pairs that were DEGs in either trend or dosage at the flower-fruit transition between the two species, which could adequately distinguish Solanum and Physalis, implying that differential gene expression at fertilization might play essential roles during the divergence and fruit evolution of Solanum-Physalis. Virus-induced gene silencing analyses revealed the developmental roles of some transcription factor genes in fertility, Chinese lantern development, and fruit weight control in Physalis. This study presents the first floral transcriptomic resource of Physalis, and reveals some candidate genetic variations accounting for the early fruit developmental evolution in Physalis in comparison to Solanum.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.