Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32719964›Full record

Observational studyInternational urogynecology journal2021

OnabotulinumtoxinA is a well tolerated and effective treatment for refractory overactive bladder in real-world practice.

Rizwan Hamid, Maria-Fernanda Lorenzo-Gomez, Heinrich Schulte-Baukloh, Amin Boroujerdi, Anand Patel, Elisabeth Farrelly

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in International urogynecology journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02161159 (An Observational Study of BOTOX® for the Management of Urinary Incontinence in Patients With Idiopathic Overactive Bladder), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02161159 completednot on this map

An Observational Study of BOTOX® for the Management of Urinary Incontinence in Patients With Idiopathic Overactive Bladder

TypeobservationalSponsorAllerganRan2014 to 2016Enrolled515ConditionsUrinary Incontinence, Urinary Bladder, OveractiveArmsbotulinum toxin Type A
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Rizwan HamidUniversity College London Hospitals, Euston Road, London, NW1 2BU, UK. hamid_rizwan@hotmail.com.
Maria-Fernanda Lorenzo-GomezUniversity Hospital of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.
Heinrich Schulte-BauklohUrologic practice, Department of Urology, Charité University Hospital, Berlin, Germany.
Amin BoroujerdiAllergan plc, Irvine, CA, USA.
Anand PatelAllergan plc, Marlow, UK.
Elisabeth FarrellySödersjukhuset, Stockholm South General Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Allergan (United Kingdom) · GBAllergan (United States) · USCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DERoyal London Hospital · GBStockholm South General Hospital · SEUniversidad de Salamanca · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and hypothesisIn randomized clinical trials onabotulinumtoxinA was demonstrated to be an effective and well-tolerated treatment for overactive bladder (OAB) with urinary incontinence (UI). However, data reporting onabotulinumtoxinA use in everyday clinical practice are limited. Here, we present the results from a large, first-of-its-kind real-world study in patients with OAB.

methodsThis was a prospective, observational, multinational study (GRACE; ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT02161159) performed in four European countries. Patients (N = 504) aged ≥ 18 years with OAB inadequately managed with ≥ 1 anticholinergic received onabotulinumtoxinA per their physician's normal clinical practice.

resultsPhysicians primarily used rigid cystoscopes for onabotulinumtoxinA injection; anesthesia/analgesia was utilized during most treatment procedures. Significant reductions in UI episodes/day from baseline to weeks 1 and 12 were observed as well as in micturition, urgency, and nocturia episodes/day. These improvements in urinary symptoms corresponded to higher scores on the treatment benefit scale at week 12. The use of other OAB medications dropped from baseline to weeks 1 and 12 and was sustained to week 52, which paralleled a reduction in the number of incontinence products used during that time frame. Adverse reactions were reported in 2.6% of patients throughout the study.

conclusionsIn this real-world study, significant improvements in urinary symptoms were seen following onabotulinumtoxinA treatment as early as week 1 and sustained to at least week 12. This was accompanied by a reduced reliance upon incontinence products and reduction in concomitant OAB medication use. OnabotulinumtoxinA was well tolerated with no new safety signals.

Indexed as

Botulinum Toxins, Type AUrinary Bladder, OveractiveAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overEuropeFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesQuality of LifeTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultBotulinum Toxins, Type AOnabotulinumtoxinAOveractive bladderQuality of lifeUrinary incontinence

Identifiers

PMID32719964
PMCPMC7788019
OpenAlexW3044776901

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.