SynthesisAnnals of work exposures and health2020
Potential Scenarios and Hazards in the Work of the Future: A Systematic Review of the Peer-Reviewed and Gray Literatures.
Synthesis in Annals of work exposures and health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
34 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- OSH risk management policies between North America and Southeast Asia-a comparative review.Frontiers in public health · 2025Pooled it
- Can we distinguish the roles of demographic and temporal changes in the incidence and prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders? A systematic review.Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health · 2022Pooled it
- A survey on occupational medicine residency programs across european countries.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Designing strategic scenarios for the digital transition.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- The Geneva Partnership Commitment: a globalnetwork for evidence-based policy and practice on psychosocial risks and mental health at work.Industrial health · 2026Article
- Exploring the future of occupational safety research: A strategic foresight approach.Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene · 2025Review
- Industrial Robotics and the Future of Work.American journal of industrial medicine · 2025Review
- Psychosocial risks and ethical implications of technology: considerations for decent work.Annals of work exposures and health · 2025Article
- Credit-frequency compliance paradox and dual-track hazard evolution in urban occupational health.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- The Challenge of New Forms of Work, Innovative Technologies, and Aging on Decent Work: Opportunities for Occupational Safety and Health.La Medicina del lavoro · 2024Article
- The future of pharmacy work: How pharmacists are adapting to and preparing for technology infusion.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2024Article
- Workplace digitalization and workload: changes and reciprocal relations across 3 years.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- The sound of safety: exploring the determinants of prevention intention in noisy industrial workplaces.BMC public health · 2024Article
- The evolution of new and emerging occupational health and safety risks: A qualitative review.Work (Reading, Mass.) · 2024Review
- Relationship Between Occupational Safety and Health Policy Principles, Organizational Action on Work-related Stress and the Psychosocial Work Environment in Italy.Safety and health at work · 2023Article
- Psychosocial Risks in the Changing World of Work: Moving from the Risk Assessment Culture to the Management of Opportunities.La Medicina del lavoro · 2023Review
- Four Futures for Occupational Safety and Health.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Review
- Expanding the Focus of Occupational Safety and Health: Lessons from a Series of Linked Scientific Meetings.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Review
- Occupational Safety and Health Staging Framework for Decent Work.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Promising Occupational Safety, Health, and Well-Being Approaches to Explore the Future of Work in the USA: An Editorial.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
It would be useful for researchers, practitioners, and decision-makers to anticipate the hazards that workers will face in the future. The focus of this study is a systematic review of published information to identify and characterize scenarios and hazards in the future of work. Eleven bibliographic databases were systematically searched for papers and reports published from 1999 to 2019 that described future of work scenarios or identified future work-related hazards. To compile a comprehensive collection of views of the future, supplemental and ad hoc searches were also performed. After screening all search records against a set of predetermined criteria, the review yielded 36 references (17 peer-reviewed, 4 gray, and 15 supplemental) containing scenarios. In these, the future of work was described along multiple conceptual axes (e.g. labor market changes, societal values, and manual versus cognitive work). Technology was identified as the primary driver of the future of work in most scenarios, and there were divergent views in the literature as to whether technology will create more or fewer jobs than it displaces. Workforce demographics, globalization, climate change, economic conditions, and urbanization were also mentioned as influential factors. Other important themes included human enhancement, social isolation, loneliness, worker monitoring, advanced manufacturing, hazardous exposures, sustainability, biotechnology, and synthetic biology. Pandemics have not been widely considered in the future of work literature, but the recent COVID-19 pandemic illustrates that was short-sighted. Pandemics may accelerate future of work trends and merit critical consideration in scenario development. Many scenarios described 'new' or 'exacerbated' psychosocial hazards of work, whereas comparatively fewer discussed physical, chemical, or biological hazards. Various preventive recommendations were identified. In particular, reducing stress associated with precarious work and its requirements of continual skill preparation and training was acknowledged as critical for protecting and promoting the health and well-being of the future workforce. In conclusion, the future of work will be comprised of diverse complex scenarios and a mosaic of old and new hazards. These findings may serve as the basis for considering how to shape the future of work.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.