Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32719832›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. CHI Conference2020

Approach Matters: Linking Practitioner Approaches to Technology Design for People with Dementia.

Emma Dixon, Amanda Lazar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. CHI Conference, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Introducing and Familiarising Older Adults Living with Dementia and Their Caregivers to Virtual Reality.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. How Content Authored by People with Dementia Affects Attitudes towards Dementia.Proceedings of the ACM on human-computer interaction · 2021
    Article
  9. DesigningExtended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems. CHI Conference · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Emma DixoniSchool, Trace Center, HCIL, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA.
Amanda LazariSchool, Trace Center, HCIL, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA.

Funding

ACL HHS 90REGE0008
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Technology design for dementia is an active and growing area. Though work to date has largely addressed functional needs, there is a growing recognition of the importance of supporting meaningful activities. However, technology for active, rather than passive, engagement is relatively novel beyond specific applications (e.g., music or reminiscence therapy). To better understand how to support active engagement of people with dementia in activities, we interviewed nineteen practitioners. Our findings reveal differing approaches to making sense of the actions of people with dementia, as well as to engaging them in activities. We discuss the importance of tracing epistemological understandings of dementia to different configurations of technology for people living with dementia and provide a practical guide to support designers to do so. Finally, we discuss considerations for the design of dementia technologies around facilitating self-actualization and managing emotional exposure for care-providers.

Indexed as

concepts and modelsDementiadesignHuman-centered computing~HCI theorymeaningful activitiespractitioners

Identifiers

PMID32719832
PMCPMC7383934

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.