Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32719814›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2020

Vaginal Microbiota Changes During Estrous Cycle in Dairy Heifers.

Juan J Quereda, Marta Barba, María Lorena Mocé, Jesús Gomis, Estrella Jiménez-Trigos, Ángel García-Muñoz, Ángel Gómez-Martín, Pedro González-Torres, Belén Carbonetto, Empar García-Roselló

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 87 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Reproductive Tract Microbiota of Mares.Veterinary sciences · 2024
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Juan J QueredaMicrobiological Agents Associated With Animal Reproduction (ProVaginBio), Faculty of Veterinary Sciences, University Cardenal Herrera CEU, CEU Universities, Valencia, Spain.
Marta BarbaMicrobiological Agents Associated With Animal Reproduction (ProVaginBio), Faculty of Veterinary Sciences, University Cardenal Herrera CEU, CEU Universities, Valencia, Spain.
María Lorena MocéMicrobiological Agents Associated With Animal Reproduction (ProVaginBio), Faculty of Veterinary Sciences, University Cardenal Herrera CEU, CEU Universities, Valencia, Spain.
Jesús GomisMicrobiological Agents Associated With Animal Reproduction (ProVaginBio), Faculty of Veterinary Sciences, University Cardenal Herrera CEU, CEU Universities, Valencia, Spain.
Estrella Jiménez-TrigosMicrobiological Agents Associated With Animal Reproduction (ProVaginBio), Faculty of Veterinary Sciences, University Cardenal Herrera CEU, CEU Universities, Valencia, Spain.
Ángel García-MuñozMicrobiological Agents Associated With Animal Reproduction (ProVaginBio), Faculty of Veterinary Sciences, University Cardenal Herrera CEU, CEU Universities, Valencia, Spain.
Ángel Gómez-MartínMicrobiological Agents Associated With Animal Reproduction (ProVaginBio), Faculty of Veterinary Sciences, University Cardenal Herrera CEU, CEU Universities, Valencia, Spain.
Pedro González-TorresMicroomics Systems S.L., Barcelona, Spain.
Belén CarbonettoMicroomics Systems S.L., Barcelona, Spain.
Empar García-RosellóMicrobiological Agents Associated With Animal Reproduction (ProVaginBio), Faculty of Veterinary Sciences, University Cardenal Herrera CEU, CEU Universities, Valencia, Spain.
Universidad Cardenal Herrera CEU · ESAnaxomics (Spain) · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The vaginal microbiota plays an important role in the health of dairy cattle, and it could be manipulated for the prevention and treatment of reproduction-related infections. The present study profiles and compares the vaginal microbiota of healthy dairy heifers during the estrous cycle focusing the results in follicular (estrus) and luteal (diestrus) phases using 16S rRNA sequencing of the V3-V4 hypervariable region. Twenty 13-16-months-old virgin dairy heifers from a single farm were included in this study. Vaginal swabs and blood samples were obtained during estrus (6-8 h before artificial insemination) and diestrus (14 days after insemination). Estrus was evaluated by an activity monitoring system and confirmed with plasma progesterone immunoassay. Results showed that the taxonomic composition of the vaginal microbiota was different during the follicular and luteal phases. At the phylum level, the most abundant bacterial phyla were Tenericutes, Firmicutes, and Bacteroidetes which comprised more than 75% of the vaginal microbiota composition. The next more abundant phyla, in order of decreasing abundance, were Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, Fusobacteria, Epsilonbacteraeota, and Patescibacteria. Together with Tenericutes, Firmicutes, and Bacteroidetes represented more than 96% of the bacterial composition.

Indexed as

16S metagenomicsbovinediestrusestrusLactobacillusvaginal microbiota

Identifiers

PMID32719814
PMCPMC7350931
OpenAlexW3039438719

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.