Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32719783›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2020

Conductive Hydroxyethyl Cellulose/Soy Protein Isolate/Polyaniline Conduits for Enhancing Peripheral Nerve Regeneration via Electrical Stimulation.

Ping Wu, Yanan Zhao, Feixiang Chen, Ao Xiao, Qiaoyue Du, Qi Dong, Meifang Ke, Xiao Liang, Qing Zhou, Yun Chen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. 3D Printed Personalized Nerve Guide Conduits for Precision Repair of Peripheral Nerve Defects.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ping WuDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Yanan ZhaoDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Feixiang ChenDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Ao XiaoDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Qiaoyue DuDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Qi DongDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Meifang KeDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Xiao LiangDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Qing ZhouDepartment of Ultrasound Imaging, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Yun ChenDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Wuhan University · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nerve regeneration remains a challenge to the treatment of peripheral nerve injury. Electrical stimulation (ES) is an assistant treatment to enhance recovery from peripheral nerve injury. A conductive nerve guide conduit was prepared from hydroxyethyl cellulose (HEC)/soy protein isolate (SPI)/PANI sponge (HSPS) and then the HSPS conduits were used to repair 10 mm sciatic nerve injury in rat model with or without ES, using HSPS+brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and autografts as controls. The nerve repairing capacities were evaluated by animal experiments of behavioristics, electrophysiology, toluidine blue staining, and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) in the regenerated nerves. The results revealed that the nerve regeneration efficiency of HSPS conduits with ES (HSPS+ES) group was the best among the conduit groups but slightly lower than that of autografts group. HSPS+ES group even exhibited notably increased in the BDNF expression of regenerated nerve tissues, which was also confirmed through

Indexed as

electrical stimulationhydroxyethyl celluloseperipheral nerve injurypolyanilinesoy protein isolate

Identifiers

PMID32719783
PMCPMC7347754
OpenAlexW3038337127

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.