Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32719736›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer policy2020

Promoting evidence-based practices for breast cancer care through web-based collaborative learning.

M K Cira, R Tesfay, J A Zujewski, D T Sinulingga, S Aung, K Mwakatobe, N Lasebikan, B Nkegoum, K Duncan, A Dvaladze

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer policy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

M K CiraClinical Monitoring Research Program Directorate, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Rockville, MD, USA.
R TesfayNational Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA.
J A ZujewskiLeidos Biomedical Research, Inc., Bethesda, MD, USA.
D T SinulinggaNational Cancer Center - Dharmais Cancer Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia.
S AungMyanmar Oncology Society, Yangon, Myanmar.
K MwakatobeTanzania Breast Cancer Foundation, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
N LasebikanUniversity of Nigeria Teaching Hospital, Enugu, Nigeria.
B NkegoumUniversity Hospital Center, Yaounde, Cameroon.
K DuncanNational Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA.
A DvaladzeUniversity of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.

Funding

WORK ORDER 126643 B539 EXPAND IC SUITE75N91019D00024 · NIAID · LEIDOS BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH, INC. · PI PENDLETON, RICHARD · 2019 to 2025
$3932.6M
Intramural NIH HHS Z99 CA999999NCI NIH HHS 75N91019D00024
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Knowledge Summaries for Comprehensive Breast Cancer Control (KSBCs) are a series of 14 publications aligned with World Health Organization guidance on evidence-based breast cancer control and accepted frameworks for action. To study utilization of the KSBCs in the development of locally relevant breast cancer control policies and programs in limited resource settings, the National Cancer Institute Center for Global Health, the University of Washington and the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center developed the Project ECHO® for KSBCs (KSBC ECHO). Project ECHO is an online model which employs case-based learning, while promoting multi-directional learning and network-building. The program was evaluated using a pre-post study design to assess if this online collaborative learning platform can be an effective model for dissemination and utilization of the KSBCs to inform breast cancer control programs and policy advocacy in limited resource settings. A total of 28 KSBC ECHO participants (57%) responded to the baseline and endpoint program evaluation surveys. Across all 28 respondents, analysis of the data indicates that knowledge increase was statistically significant overall: average knowledge gain was 0.77, 95% CI [0.44 - 1.08] and p value < 0.0001. A majority of responding team leads reported that the core ECHO components (case/didactic presentations, discussion) contributed to a great extent to strengthening their project proposal/goals. Program evaluation survey responses indicate that utilization of this online platform provided an opportunity for individual knowledge gain, multi-directional information exchange, network-building, and strengthening of the proposed breast cancer control projects based in limited resource settings.

Indexed as

AdvocacyBreast cancerCancer controlCancer policyGlobal healthLimited resource settingNetwork buildingOnline educationVideo technologyWeb-based learning

Identifiers

PMID32719736
PMCPMC7384698

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.