Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32719690›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2020

Comparative Plastid Genomics of Neotropical

Michelle Zavala-Páez, Leila do Nascimento Vieira, Valter Antônio de Baura, Eduardo Balsanelli, Emanuel Maltempi de Souza, Marco Cerna Cevallos, Mark W Chase, Eric de Camargo Smidt

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
16.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The Complete Chloroplast Genomes ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Characterization ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  11. Characteristics and Comparative Analysis of Seven Complete Plastomes ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  12. Characterization and Comparative Analysis of the Complete Plastomes of FiveInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  13. Notes to the Taxonomic Affiliation of theInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

Michelle Zavala-PáezDepartamento de Botânica, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil.
Leila do Nascimento VieiraDepartamento de Botânica, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil.
Valter Antônio de BauraDepartamento de Bioquímica e Biologia Molecular, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil.
Eduardo BalsanelliDepartamento de Bioquímica e Biologia Molecular, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil.
Emanuel Maltempi de SouzaDepartamento de Bioquímica e Biologia Molecular, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil.
Marco Cerna CevallosGrupo de Investigación Nunkui Wakan, Universidad Politécnica Salesiana, Quito, Ecuador.
Mark W ChaseRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, United Kingdom.
Eric de Camargo SmidtDepartamento de Botânica, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil.
Universidade Federal do Paraná · BRCurtin University · AUPolitecnica Salesiana University · EC

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pantropical

Indexed as

molecular evolutionmolecular markersNeotropical orchidsnext-generation sequencingplastid genome

Identifiers

PMID32719690
PMCPMC7347972
OpenAlexW3040331429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.