Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32719617›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in physiology2020

Impacts of Microgravity Analogs to Spaceflight on Cerebral Autoregulation.

Marc Kermorgant, Nathalie Nasr, Marek Czosnyka, Dina N Arvanitis, Ophélie Hélissen, Jean-Michel Senard, Anne Pavy-Le Traon

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in physiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Rheoencephalography: A non-invasive method for neuromonitoring.Journal of electrical bioimpedance · 2024
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Cerebral Circulation and Brain Temperature during an Ultra-Short Session of Dry Immersion in Young Subjects.Pathophysiology : the official journal of the International Society for Pathophysiology · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Marc KermorgantINSERM UMR 1048, Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Diseases (I2MC), Toulouse, France.
Nathalie NasrINSERM UMR 1048, Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Diseases (I2MC), Toulouse, France.
Marek CzosnykaBrain Physics Laboratory, Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Cambridge University Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Dina N ArvanitisINSERM UMR 1048, Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Diseases (I2MC), Toulouse, France.
Ophélie HélissenINSERM UMR 1048, Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Diseases (I2MC), Toulouse, France.
Jean-Michel SenardINSERM UMR 1048, Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Diseases (I2MC), Toulouse, France.
Anne Pavy-Le TraonINSERM UMR 1048, Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Diseases (I2MC), Toulouse, France.
Inserm · FRInstitut des Maladies Métaboliques et Cardiovasculaires · FRWarsaw University of Technology · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is well known that exposure to microgravity in astronauts leads to a plethora physiological responses such as headward fluid shift, body unloading, and cardiovascular deconditioning. When astronauts return to Earth, some encounter problems related to orthostatic intolerance. An impaired cerebral autoregulation (CA), which could be compromised by the effects of microgravity, has been proposed as one of the mechanisms responsible for orthostatic intolerance. CA is a homeostatic mechanism that maintains cerebral blood flow for any variations in cerebral perfusion pressure by adapting the vascular tone and cerebral vessel diameter. The ground-based models of microgravity are useful tools for determining the gravitational impact of spaceflight on human body. The head-down tilt bed rest (HDTBR), where the subject remains in supine position at -6 degrees for periods ranging from few days to several weeks is the most commonly used ground-based model of microgravity for cardiovascular deconditioning. head-down bed rest (HDBR) is able to replicate cephalic fluid shift, immobilization, confinement, and inactivity. Dry immersion (DI) model is another approach where the subject remains immersed in thermoneutral water covered with an elastic waterproof fabric separating the subject from the water. Regarding DI, this analog imitates absence of any supporting structure for the body, centralization of body fluids, immobilization and hypokinesia observed during spaceflight. However, little is known about the impact of microgravity on CA. Here, we review the fundamental principles and the different mechanisms involved in CA. We also consider the different approaches in order to assess CA. Finally, we focus on the effects of short- and long-term spaceflight on CA and compare these findings with two specific analogs to microgravity: HDBR and DI.

Indexed as

cerebral autoregulationdry immersionhead-down bed restmicrogravityspaceflight analog

Identifiers

PMID32719617
PMCPMC7350784
OpenAlexW3039698010

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.