Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32719416›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Prospects of GWAS and predictive breeding for European winter wheat's grain protein content, grain starch content, and grain hardness.

Quddoos H Muqaddasi, Jonathan Brassac, Erhard Ebmeyer, Sonja Kollers, Viktor Korzun, Odile Argillier, Gunther Stiewe, Jörg Plieske, Martin W Ganal, Marion S Röder

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Quality variation of house cricket (Food chemistry: X · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Quddoos H MuqaddasiLeibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (IPK), Corrensstraße 3, 06466, Stadt Seeland OT Gatersleben, Germany. muqaddasi@ipk-gatersleben.de.
Jonathan BrassacLeibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (IPK), Corrensstraße 3, 06466, Stadt Seeland OT Gatersleben, Germany.
Erhard EbmeyerKWS LOCHOW GmbH, 29303, Bergen, Germany.
Sonja KollersKWS LOCHOW GmbH, 29303, Bergen, Germany.
Viktor KorzunKWS LOCHOW GmbH, 29303, Bergen, Germany.
Odile ArgillierSyngenta France S.A.S, 78910, Orgerus, France.
Gunther StieweSyngenta Seeds GmbH, 32107, Bad Salzuflen, Germany.
Jörg PlieskeTraitGenetics GmbH, Am Schwabeplan 1b, 06466, Stadt Seeland OT Gatersleben, Germany.
Martin W GanalTraitGenetics GmbH, Am Schwabeplan 1b, 06466, Stadt Seeland OT Gatersleben, Germany.
Marion S RöderLeibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (IPK), Corrensstraße 3, 06466, Stadt Seeland OT Gatersleben, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Grain quality traits determine the classification of registered wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) varieties. Although environmental factors and crop management practices exert a considerable influence on wheat quality traits, a significant proportion of the variance is attributed to the genetic factors. To identify the underlying genetic factors of wheat quality parameters viz., grain protein content (GPC), grain starch content (GSC), and grain hardness (GH), we evaluated 372 diverse European wheat varieties in replicated field trials in up to eight environments. We observed that all of the investigated traits hold a wide and significant genetic variation, and a significant negative correlation exists between GPC and GSC plus grain yield. Our association analyses based on 26,694 high-quality single nucleotide polymorphic markers revealed a strong quantitative genetic nature of GPC and GSC with associations on groups 2, 3, and 6 chromosomes. The identification of known Puroindoline-b gene for GH provided a positive analytic proof for our studies. We report that a locus QGpc.ipk-6A controls both GPC and GSC with opposite allelic effects. Based on wheat's reference and pan-genome sequences, the physical characterization of two loci viz., QGpc.ipk-2B and QGpc.ipk-6A facilitated the identification of the candidate genes for GPC. Furthermore, by exploiting additive and epistatic interactions of loci, we evaluated the prospects of predictive breeding for the investigated traits that suggested its efficient use in the breeding programs.

Indexed as

Genome-Wide Association StudyPlant BreedingAllelesGenetic MarkersGenetics, PopulationGenetic VariationGrain ProteinsHaplotypesHardnessLinkage DisequilibriumMolecular Sequence AnnotationPhenotypePhysical Chromosome MappingPrincipal Component AnalysisQuantitative Trait LociStarchGenetic MarkersGrain ProteinsStarch

Identifiers

PMID32719416
PMCPMC7385145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.