Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32719375›Full record

ArticleNature communications2020

VoPo leverages cellular heterogeneity for predictive modeling of single-cell data.

Natalie Stanley, Ina A Stelzer, Amy S Tsai, Ramin Fallahzadeh, Edward Ganio, Martin Becker, Thanaphong Phongpreecha, Huda Nassar, Sajjad Ghaemi, Ivana Maric and 20 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Leveraging Single-Cell RNA-Seq to Generate Robust Microglia Aging Clocks.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. In-silico generation of high-dimensional immune response data in patients using a deep neural network.Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Comparative analysis between highFrontiers in oncology · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

30 authors.

Natalie Stanley *Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, USA.
Ina A Stelzer *Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9974-4661
Amy S TsaiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2380-6424
Ramin FallahzadehDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, USA.
Edward GanioDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, USA.
Martin BeckerDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4296-3481
Thanaphong PhongpreechaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9245-6686
Huda NassarDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, USA.
Sajjad GhaemiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, USA.
Ivana MaricDepartment of Pediatrics, Stanford University, Stanford, USA.
Anthony CulosDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0083-6994
Alan L ChangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, USA.
Maria XenochristouDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, USA.
Xiaoyuan HanDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6394-3055
Camilo EspinosaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, USA.
Kristen RumerDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, USA.
Laura PetersonDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, USA.
Franck VerdonkDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7061-5594
Dyani GaudilliereDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, USA.
Eileen TsaiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, USA.
Dorien FeyaertsDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, USA.
Jakob EinhausDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3450-4325
Kazuo AndoDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, USA.
Ronald J WongDepartment of Pediatrics, Stanford University, Stanford, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1205-6936
Gerlinde ObermoserCenter for Human Systems Immunology, Stanford University, Stanford, USA.
Gary M ShawDepartment of Pediatrics, Stanford University, Stanford, USA.
David K StevensonDepartment of Pediatrics, Stanford University, Stanford, USA.
Martin S AngstDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1550-8136
Brice GaudilliereDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3475-5706
Nima AghaeepourDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, USA. naghaeep@stanford.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6117-8764

Funding

MOLECULAR &CELLULAR IMMUNOBIOLOGYT32AI007290 · NIAID · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Sean Curtis Bendall, Olivia M Martinez · 1985 to 2026
$27.0M
Institutional Career Development Core (KL2)KL2TR003143 · NCATS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI ASCH, STEVEN M. · 2019 to 2023
$8.7M
SPRINT: Signature for Pain Recovery IN TeensR61NS114926 · NINDS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI SIMONS, LAURA E · 2019 to 2019
$5.4M
Research in Anesthesia Training Program (ReAP)T32GM089626 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Vivianne L Tawfik · 2010 to 2026
$5.2M
Dietary Modulation of Neuroinflammation in Age-Related Memory DisordersR01AG058417 · NIA · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI SLOAN, RICHARD P, SMALL, SCOTT A · 2018 to 2022
$4.2M
Machine Learning for Integrative Modeling of the Immune System in Clinical SettingsR35GM138353 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI AGHAEEPOUR, NIMA · 2020 to 2024
$2.2M
Harnessing the human monocyte system to improve surgical recoveryR35GM137936 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI GAUDILLIERE, BRICE · 2020 to 2024
$2.0M
Role of Myeloid Derived Suppressor Cells in the Immune Response to SurgeryK23GM111657 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI GAUDILLIERE, BRICE · 2014 to 2017
$524k
Identifying a Systemic Immune Signature of Periodontal Disease with Mass CytometryR21DE027728 · NIDCR · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI GAUDILLIERE, BRICE, GAUDILLIERE, DYANI · 2018 to 2019
$432k
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR003143NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI007290NIA NIH HHS R01 AG058417NIDCR NIH HHS R21 DE027728NIGMS NIH HHS K23 GM111657NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM137936NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM138353NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM089626NINDS NIH HHS R61 NS114926
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-throughput single-cell analysis technologies produce an abundance of data that is critical for profiling the heterogeneity of cellular systems. We introduce VoPo (https://github.com/stanleyn/VoPo), a machine learning algorithm for predictive modeling and comprehensive visualization of the heterogeneity captured in large single-cell datasets. In three mass cytometry datasets, with the largest measuring hundreds of millions of cells over hundreds of samples, VoPo defines phenotypically and functionally homogeneous cell populations. VoPo further outperforms state-of-the-art machine learning algorithms in classification tasks, and identified immune-correlates of clinically-relevant parameters.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsModels, BiologicalSingle-Cell AnalysisCluster AnalysisDatabases as TopicFlow CytometryHumans

Identifiers

PMID32719375
PMCPMC7385162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.