Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32719161›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2020

Temporal Signatures of Criticality in Human Cortical Excitability as Probed by Early Somatosensory Responses.

Tilman Stephani, Gunnar Waterstraat, Stefan Haufe, Gabriel Curio, Arno Villringer, Vadim V Nikulin

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Excitability Modulations of Somatosensory Perception Do Not Depend on Feedforward Neuronal Population Spikes.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Genetic polymorphisms iniScience · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Tilman StephaniDepartment of Neurology, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, 04103 Leipzig, Germany stephani@cbs.mpg.de nikulin@cbs.mpg.de.ORCID 0000-0003-3323-3874
Gunnar WaterstraatNeurophysics Group, Department of Neurology, Campus Benjamin Franklin,Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 12203 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7215-5111
Stefan HaufeBerlin Center for Advanced Neuroimaging, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1470-9195
Gabriel CurioNeurophysics Group, Department of Neurology, Campus Benjamin Franklin,Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 12203 Berlin, Germany.
Arno VillringerDepartment of Neurology, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2604-2404
Vadim V NikulinDepartment of Neurology, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, 04103 Leipzig, Germany stephani@cbs.mpg.de nikulin@cbs.mpg.de.ORCID 0000-0001-6082-3859
Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience Berlin · DECharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEFranklin University · USHumboldt-Universität zu Berlin · DEMax Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences · DENational Research University Higher School of Economics · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain responses vary considerably from moment to moment, even to identical sensory stimuli. This has been attributed to changes in instantaneous neuronal states determining the system's excitability. Yet the spatiotemporal organization of these dynamics remains poorly understood. Here we test whether variability in stimulus-evoked activity can be interpreted within the framework of criticality, which postulates dynamics of neural systems to be tuned toward the phase transition between stability and instability as is reflected in scale-free fluctuations in spontaneous neural activity. Using a novel noninvasive approach in 33 male human participants, we tracked instantaneous cortical excitability by inferring the magnitude of excitatory postsynaptic currents from the N20 component of the somatosensory evoked potential. Fluctuations of cortical excitability demonstrated long-range temporal dependencies decaying according to a power law across trials, a hallmark of systems at critical states. As these dynamics covaried with changes in prestimulus oscillatory activity in the alpha band (8-13 Hz), we establish a mechanistic link between ongoing and evoked activity through cortical excitability and argue that the co-emergence of common temporal power laws may indeed originate from neural networks poised close to a critical state. In contrast, no signatures of criticality were found in subcortical or peripheral nerve activity. Thus, criticality may represent a parsimonious organizing principle of variability in stimulus-related brain processes on a cortical level, possibly reflecting a delicate equilibrium between robustness and flexibility of neural responses to external stimuli.

Indexed as

Alpha RhythmCortical ExcitabilityEvoked Potentials, SomatosensoryAdultElectric StimulationHumansMaleMedian NerveSignal Processing, Computer-AssistedSomatosensory CortexTouch PerceptionYoung AdultcomplexitycriticalityEEGexcitabilityoscillationssomatosensory

Identifiers

PMID32719161
PMCPMC7486660
OpenAlexW3044553779

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.