Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32719139›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2020

Cumulative mechanism of several major imatinib-resistant mutations in Abl kinase.

Marc Hoemberger, Warintra Pitsawong, Dorothee Kern

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marc HoembergerDepartment of Biochemistry, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA 02454.ORCID 0000-0003-2515-1094
Warintra PitsawongDepartment of Biochemistry, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA 02454.ORCID 0000-0001-5438-1783
Dorothee KernDepartment of Biochemistry, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA 02454; dkern@brandeis.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-7631-8328
Brandeis University · US

Funding

Howard Hughes Medical Institute
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the outstanding success of the cancer drug imatinib, one obstacle in prolonged treatment is the emergence of resistance mutations within the kinase domain of its target, Abl. We noticed that many patient-resistance mutations occur in the dynamic hot spots recently identified to be responsible for imatinib's high selectivity toward Abl. In this study, we provide an experimental analysis of the mechanism underlying drug resistance for three major resistance mutations (G250E, Y253F, and F317L). Our data settle controversies, revealing unexpected resistance mechanisms. The mutations alter the energy landscape of Abl in complex ways: increased kinase activity, altered affinity, and cooperativity for the substrates, and, surprisingly, only a modestly decreased imatinib affinity. Only under cellular adenosine triphosphate (ATP) concentrations, these changes cumulate in an order of magnitude increase in imatinib's half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC

Indexed as

Adenosine TriphosphateAmino Acid SequenceAntineoplastic AgentsDrug Resistance, NeoplasmHumansImatinib MesylateNeoplasmsOncogene Proteins v-ablAdenosine TriphosphateAntineoplastic AgentsImatinib MesylateOncogene Proteins v-ablAbl kinasecancer researchimatinib resistancetyrosine kinase

Identifiers

PMID32719139
PMCPMC7431045
OpenAlexW3046078147

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.