Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32719084›Full record

ArticleBMJ open quality2020

Analysis of patient safety messages delivered and received during clinical rounds.

Diane Levine, Jaya Gadivemula, Raya Kutaimy, Srinivasa Kamatam, Nagaratna Sarvadevabatla, Prateek Lohia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open quality, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Education During Ward Rounds: Systematic Review.Interactive journal of medical research · 2022
    Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Diane LevineInternal Medicine, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA dllevine@med.wayne.edu.
Jaya GadivemulaInternal Medicine, Detroit Medical Center, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA.
Raya KutaimyInternal Medicine, Detroit Medical Center, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA.
Srinivasa KamatamInternal Medicine, Detroit Medical Center, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA.
Nagaratna SarvadevabatlaInternal Medicine, Detroit Medical Center, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA.
Prateek LohiaInternal Medicine, Detroit Medical Center, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMultiple modalities are available to introduce patient safety training to healthcare professionals. In internal medicine, clinical rounds have always played an important role in education; however, the patient safety content taught at the point of care is not well studied. We studied, both quantitatively and qualitatively, the number and nature of patient safety messages delivered by attending physicians to determine what is taught at the point of care and how well this is recognised and recalled by attending physicians, residents and medical students.

methodsThis prospective mixed methods study was conducted on the medicine teaching service. Clinical rounds were audio-recorded. Immediately after rounds, attending physicians, residents and students completed a short survey card identifying the number and type of educational messages they immediately recalled teaching or hearing. Independent t-test was used to compare differences in the number of messages delivered by attendings and recalled by trainees. One-way analysis of variance was used to compare differences in messages delivered by attending physicians compared with trainees. Recordings were transcribed and analysed qualitatively for patient safety content.

resultsTrainees recalled more educational messages than attendings recalled teaching in all educational domains. Safety messages comprised 17.5% of educational messages. The average number of patient safety messages recalled per session was 1.08 per attending physicians, 1.84 per resident and 2.50 per student. Residents recalled 56.4% of safety messages delivered; students recalled 76.7% of safety messages.

conclusionPatient safety is a focus of teaching during clinical rounds and provides meaningful opportunities to train students and residents to practice safe patient care.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelClinical CompetenceCross-Sectional StudiesHumansPatient SafetyProspective StudiesQualitative ResearchStudents, MedicalSurveys and QuestionnairesTeaching Roundsmedical educationpatient safetyquality improvement

Identifiers

PMID32719084
PMCPMC7388879

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.