Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32719073›Full record

Trial reportOpen heart2020

Patients aged 80 years or older with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction or unstable angina pectoris randomised to an invasive versus conservative strategy: angiographic and procedural results from the After Eighty study.

Nicolai Tegn, Christian Eek, Michael Abdelnoor, Lars Aaberge, Knut Endresen, Rita Skårdal, Erlend Sturle Berg, Lars Gullestad, Bjørn Bendz

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Open heart, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01255540 (A Randomised Prospective Study of an Invasive Strategy Versus Medical Therapy in Patients Over 80 Years With Non ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01255540 unknown statusnot on this map

A Randomised Prospective Study of an Invasive Strategy Versus Medical Therapy in Patients Over 80 Years With Non ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (NSTEMI) or Unstable Angina Pectoris (UAP)

TypeobservationalSponsorOslo University HospitalRan2010 to 2019Enrolled492ConditionsCoronary Heart Disease
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Nicolai TegnDepartment of Cardiology, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.
Christian EekDepartment of Cardiology, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.
Michael AbdelnoorDepartment of Cardiology, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.
Lars AabergeDepartment of Cardiology, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.
Knut EndresenDepartment of Cardiology, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.
Rita SkårdalDepartment of Cardiology, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.
Erlend Sturle BergDepartment of Cardiology, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.
Lars GullestadDepartment of Cardiology, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.
Bjørn BendzDepartment of Cardiology, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway bbendz@ous-hf.no.ORCID 0000-0002-1392-6481

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesWe aimed to report the angiographic and procedural results of the After Eighty study (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01255540), and to identify independent predictors of revascularisation.

methodsPatients of ≥80 years old with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction and unstable angina pectoris were randomised to an invasive or conservative strategy. Angiographic and procedural results were recorded. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to explore variables predicting revascularisation.

resultsAmong 229 patients in the invasive group, 220 underwent immediate coronary angiography (90% performed via the radial artery). Of these patients, 48% had three-vessel disease or left main stenosis, 18% two-vessel disease, 16% one-vessel disease, 17% minor coronary vessel wall changes and two patients had normal coronary arteries. Six patients (3%) underwent coronary artery bypass graft. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) was performed in 107 patients (49%), with 57% treated with bare metal stents, 37% drug-eluting stents and 6% balloon angioplasty. On average, 1.7 lesions were treated and 2 stents delivered per patient. Complications included 1 major PCI-related bleeding (successfully treated), 2 minor access site-related bleedings, 3 side branch occlusions during PCI and 11 periprocedural myocardial infarctions (considered end points). Sex, bundle branch block and smoking were independent predictors of revascularisation.

conclusionsPCI was performed in approximately half of the patients, similar to findings in younger populations. Procedural success was high, with few complications. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01255540.

Indexed as

Conservative TreatmentCoronary AngiographyPercutaneous Coronary InterventionAged, 80 and overAge FactorsAngina, UnstableBundle-Branch BlockDrug-Eluting StentsFemaleHumansMaleNorwayPredictive Value of TestsProspective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk Factorsatherosclerosiscoronary artery diseaserisk factors

Identifiers

PMID32719073
PMCPMC7380709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.