ArticleOpen heart2020
No-reflow phenomenon and comparison to the normal-flow population postprimary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST elevation myocardial infarction: case-control study (NORM PPCI).
Article in Open heart, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Predicting the no-reflow phenomenon in ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review of clinical prediction models.Therapeutic advances in cardiovascular diseasePooled it
- Predictive Value of High-Sensitivity CRP Level on the No-Reflow Phenomenon in STEMI Patients.Cardiology research and practice · 2025Article
- Incorporating Inflammation Biomarker-Driven Multivariate Predictive Model for Coronary Microcirculatory Dysfunction in Acute Myocardial Infarction Following Emergency Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.Clinical cardiology · 2024Article
- The Role of Microvascular Obstruction and Intra-Myocardial Hemorrhage in Reperfusion Cardiac Injury. Analysis of Clinical Data.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Review
- The role and mechanisms of microvascular damage in the ischemic myocardium.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2023Review
- A historical literature review of coronary microvascular obstruction and intra-myocardial hemorrhage as functional/structural phenomena.Journal of biomedical research · 2023Article
- A Narrative Review of the Classical and Modern Diagnostic Methods of the No-Reflow Phenomenon.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Predictors in no-reflow phenomenon in acute myocardial infarction with ST-segment elevation.Archivos de cardiologia de Mexico · 2022Article
- D-dimer for risk stratification and antithrombotic treatment management in acute coronary syndrome patients: asystematic review and metanalysis.Thrombosis journal · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionNo-reflow (NR) phenomenon is characterised by the failure of myocardial reperfusion despite the absence of mechanical coronary obstruction. NR negatively affects patient outcomes, emphasising the importance of prediction and management. The objective was to evaluate the incidence and independent predictors of NR in patients presenting with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).
methodsThis was a single-centre prospective case-control study. Cases were subjects who suffered NR, and the control comparators were those who did not. Clinical outcomes were documented. Salient variables relating to the patients and their presentation, history and angiographical findings were compared using one-way analysis of variance or χ
resultsOf 173 consecutive patients, 24 (13.9%) suffered from NR, with 46% occurring post stent implantation. Patients with NR had increased risk of in-hospital death (OR 7.0, 95% CI 1.3 to 36.7, p=0.022). From baseline variables available prior to percutaneous coronary intervention, the independent predictors of NR were increased lesion complexity, admission systolic hypertension, weight of <78 kg and history of hypertension. Continuous data were transformed into best-fit binary variables, and a risk score was defined. Significant difference was demonstrated between the risk score of patients with NR (4.1±1) compared with controls (2.6±1) (p<0.001), and the risk score was considered a good test (area under the curve=0.823). A score of ≥4 had 75% sensitivity and 76.5% specificity.
conclusionPatients with NR have a higher rate of mortality following STEMI. Predictors of NR include lesion complexity, systolic hypertension and low weight. Further validation of this risk model is required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.