Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32719014›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2020

Provision of services in primary care for type 2 diabetes: a qualitative study with patients, GPs, and nurses in the East of England.

Hajira Dambha-Miller, Simon J Griffin, Ann Louise Kinmonth, Jenni Burt

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Hajira Dambha-MillerPrimary Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge; Division of Primary Care and Population Health, University of Southampton, Southampton.ORCID 0000-0003-0175-443X
Simon J GriffinPrimary Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge.
Ann Louise KinmonthPrimary Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge.
Jenni BurtHealthcare Improvement Studies Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge.
University of Cambridge · GBInstitute for Healthcare Improvement · US

Funding

Department of Health [UK] RP-PG-0606-1259Medical Research Council G0001164Medical Research Council MC_ UU_12015/4Wellcome Trust G061895
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is little evidence on the impact of national pressures on primary care provision for type 2 diabetes from the perspectives of patients, their GPs, and nurses.

aimTo explore experiences of primary care provision for people with type 2 diabetes and their respective GPs and nurses. DESIGN AND

settingA qualitative primary care interview study in the East of England.

methodSemi-structured interviews were conducted, between August 2017 and August 2018, with people who have type 2 diabetes along with their respective GPs and nurses. Purposive sampling was used to select for heterogeneity in glycaemic control and previous healthcare experiences. Interviews were audio-recorded and analysed thematically. The consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research were followed.

resultsThe authors interviewed 24 patients and 15 GPs and nurses, identifying a changing landscape of diabetes provision owing to burgeoning pressures that were presented repeatedly. Patient responders wanted GP-delivered care with continuity. They saw GPs as experts best placed to support them in managing diabetes, but were increasingly receiving nurse-led care. Nurses reported providing most of the in-person care, while GPs remained accountable but increasingly distanced from face-to-face diabetes care provision. A reluctant acknowledgement surfaced among GPs, nurses, and their patients that only minimum care standards could be maintained, with aspirations for high-quality provision unlikely to be met.

conclusionType 2 diabetes is a tracer condition that reflects many aspects of primary care. Efforts to manage pressures have not been perceived favourably by patients and providers, despite some benefits. Reframing expectations of care, by communicating solutions to both patients and providers so that they are understood, managed, and realistic, may be one way forward.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2General PractitionersNursesAttitude of Health PersonnelEnglandHumansPrimary Health CareQualitative Researchdiabetes mellitus, type 2general practitionershealth servicesnursesprimary health careprovision

Identifiers

PMID32719014
PMCPMC7390280
OpenAlexW3045524661

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.