Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32719013›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2020

Cancer incidence following a high-normal platelet count: cohort study using electronic healthcare records from English primary care.

Luke Ta Mounce, Willie Hamilton, Sarah Er Bailey

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Liquid biopsy in bladder cancer: towards precision oncology.Journal of translational medicine · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Exploration of reasons for primary care testing (the Why Test study): a UK-wide audit using the Primary care Academic CollaboraTive.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Luke Ta MounceUniversity of Exeter Medical School, Exeter.
Willie HamiltonUniversity of Exeter Medical School, Exeter.
Sarah Er BaileyUniversity of Exeter Medical School, Exeter.
University of Exeter · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK C8640/A23385
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA raised platelet count (thrombocytosis) measuring >400 × 10

aimTo investigate cancer incidence following a normal platelet count in primary care. DESIGN AND

settingA prospective cohort study was undertaken using data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink and National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service, dating from 1 May 2005 to 30 April 2014.

methodOne-year cancer incidence was estimated for 295 312 patients with normal platelet counts (150-400 × 10

resultsOne-year cancer incidence increased greatly with age, male sex, and higher platelet count. Males aged ≥60 years with a high-normal count had an incidence of 4.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 4.0 to 4.4). The highest incidence of 6.7% (95% CI = 5.3 to 8.4) was found in males aged ≥80 years, who had platelets in the range of 376-400 × 10

conclusionPlatelet counts at the high-normal range in males aged ≥60 years may be indicative of an underlying malignancy, and referral for further investigation should be considered.

Indexed as

Blood PlateletsNeoplasmsCohort StudiesDelivery of Health CareElectronicsFemaleHumansIncidenceMalePrimary Health CareProspective Studiesblood plateletscancer incidenceepidemiologyprimary care

Identifiers

PMID32719013
PMCPMC7390285
OpenAlexW3045744783

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.