Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32718998›Full record

ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2020

Tumor Subtype Determines Therapeutic Response to Chimeric Polypeptide Nanoparticle-based Chemotherapy in

Rebecca D Dodd, Amanda Scherer, Wesley Huang, Gavin R McGivney, Wade R Gutierrez, Emily A Laverty, Kathleen A Ashcraft, Victoria R Stephens, Parisa Yousefpour, Soumen Saha and 9 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rebecca D DoddDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa. rebecca-dodd@uiowa.edu david.kirsch@duke.edu.
Amanda SchererDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa.
Wesley HuangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.ORCID 0000-0003-0551-8397
Gavin R McGivneyDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa.ORCID 0000-0001-8544-9832
Wade R GutierrezDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa.ORCID 0000-0002-0643-3566
Emily A LavertyDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa.
Kathleen A AshcraftDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
Victoria R StephensDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa.
Parisa YousefpourDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Soumen SahaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.ORCID 0000-0003-3533-6703
Vickie Knepper-AdrianDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa.
Warren FloydDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
Mark ChenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
Yan MaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
Eric M MastriaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.ORCID 0000-0002-5112-4543
Diana M CardonaDepartment of Pathology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
William C EwardDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
Ashutosh ChilkotiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.ORCID 0000-0002-1569-2228
David G KirschDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina. rebecca-dodd@uiowa.edu david.kirsch@duke.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-2086-205X
Duke University · USUniversity of Iowa · US

Funding

Viral VectorP30CA086862 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI Christopher K Laubenthal · 2000 to 2026
$70.0M
MEDICAL SCIENTIST TRAINING PROGRAMT32GM007171 · NIGMS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI KONTOS, CHRISTOPHER D · 1985 to 2021
$31.2M
MEDICAL SCIENTIST TRAINING PROGRAMT32GM007337 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI GEYER, PAMELA K., LENTZ, STEVEN R · 1985 to 2020
$15.9M
Advancing Cancer Therapy through Ground Breaking Research in Radiation BiologyR35CA197616 · NCI · ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE CORP · PI David Guy Kirsch · 2016 to 2026
$10.7M
Medical Scientist Training Program Training GrantT32GM145449 · NIGMS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI Christopher D Kontos · 2022 to 2026
$6.6M
Predoctoral Training in the Pharmacological SciencesT32GM067795 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI STRACK, STEFAN · 2004 to 2021
$3.4M
Using CRISPR/Cas9 to dissect the role of FUS-CHOP in tumor response to radiation therapyF30CA206424 · NCI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI CHEN, MARK SHUO · 2016 to 2019
$155k
NCI NIH HHS F30 CA206424NCI NIH HHS P30 CA086862NCI NIH HHS R35 CA197616NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007171NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007337NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM067795NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM145449
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeNanoparticle-encapsulated drug formulations can improve responses to conventional chemotherapy by increasing drug retention within the tumor and by promoting a more effective antitumor immune response than free drug. New drug delivery modalities are needed in sarcomas because they are often chemoresistant cancers, but the rarity of sarcomas and the complexity of diverse subtypes makes it challenging to investigate novel drug formulations. EXPERIMENTAL

designNew drug formulations can be tested in animal models of sarcomas where the therapeutic response of different formulations can be compared using mice with identical tumor-initiating mutations. Here, using Cre/loxP and CRISPR/Cas9 techniques, we generated two distinct mouse models of

resultsThe CP-Dox formulation was superior to free doxorubicin in MPNST models. However, in UPS tumors, CP-Dox did not improve survival in comparison with free doxorubicin. While CP-Dox treatment resulted in elevated intratumoral doxorubicin concentrations in MPNSTs, this increase was absent in UPS tumors. In addition, elevation of CD8

conclusionsThese results have important implications for treating sarcomas with nanoparticle-encapsulated chemotherapy by highlighting the tumor subtype-dependent nature of therapeutic response.

Indexed as

AnimalsCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesCell Line, TumorDisease Models, AnimalDoxorubicinDrug CarriersDrug Screening Assays, AntitumorHumansMiceMice, KnockoutMicellesNanoparticlesNerve Sheath NeoplasmsPeptidesPTEN PhosphohydrolaseSarcomaDoxorubicinDrug CarriersMicellesPeptidesPTEN PhosphohydrolasePten protein, mouse

Identifiers

PMID32718998
PMCPMC7641033
OpenAlexW3044374849

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.