ArticleBMJ open2020
PROMISE (Program Refinements to Optimize Model Impact and Scalability based on Evidence): a cluster-randomised, stepped-wedge trial assessing effectiveness of the revised versus original Ryan White Part A HIV Care Coordination Programme for patients with barriers to treatment in the USA.
Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03628287 (Program Refinements to Optimize Model Impact and Scalability Based on Evidence), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Program Refinements to Optimize Model Impact and Scalability Based on Evidence
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Addressing Mental Health Barriers in HIV Care Coordination Is Crucial to Providing Optimal HIV/AIDS Care.AIDS patient care and STDs · 2024Trial
- Burden of mental health symptoms and access to needed mental health care among people with HIV in New England.AIDS care · 2026Article
- Impact of an HIV Care Coordination Program on All-cause, HIV-related, and Non-HIV-related Mortality in Younger and Older Adults With HIV in New York City, 2018-2022.Open forum infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Impact of a Revised Ryan White Part A HIV Care Coordination Program on Viral Suppression and Durable Viral Suppression.Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999) · 2026Article
- "We're Going to Be Here": Providers' Perspectives on Implementing a Revised HIV Care Coordination Program.AIDS patient care and STDs · 2025Article
- Article
- Heterogeneity of provider preferences for HIV Care Coordination Program features: latent class analysis of a discrete choice experiment.HIV research & clinical practice · 2024Article
- Client preferences for HIV Care Coordination Program features in New York City: latent class analysis of a discrete choice experiment.Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2023Article
- Provider preferences for delivery of HIV care coordination services: results from a discrete choice experiment.Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
introductionGrowing evidence supports combining social, behavioural and biomedical strategies to strengthen the HIV care continuum. However, combination interventions can be resource-intensive and challenging to scale up. Research is needed to identify intervention components and delivery models that maximise uptake, engagement and effectiveness. In New York City (NYC), a multicomponent Ryan White Part A-funded medical case management intervention called the Care Coordination Programme (CCP) was launched at 28 agencies in 2009 in order to address barriers to care and treatment. Effectiveness estimates based on >7000 clients enrolled by April 2013 and their controls indicated modest CCP benefits over 'usual care' for short-term and long-term viral suppression, with substantial room for improvement. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Integrating evaluation findings and CCP service-provider and community-stakeholder input on modifications, the NYC Health Department packaged a Care Coordination Redesign (CCR) in a 2017 request for proposals. Following competitive re-solicitation, 17 of the original CCP-implementing agencies secured contracts. These agencies were randomised within matched pairs to immediate or delayed CCR implementation. Data from three 9-month periods (pre-implementation, partial implementation and full implementation) will be examined to compare CCR versus CCP effects on timely viral suppression (TVS, within 4 months of enrolment) among individuals with unsuppressed HIV viral load newly enrolling in the CCR/CCP. Based on current enrolment (n=933) and the pre-implementation outcome probability (TVS=0.54), the detectable effect size with 80% power is an OR of 2.75 (relative risk: 1.41). ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study was approved by the NYC Department of Health and Mental Hygiene Institutional Review Board (IRB, Protocol 18-009) and the City University of New York Integrated IRB (Protocol 018-0057) with a waiver of informed consent. Findings will be disseminated via publications, conferences, stakeholder meetings, and Advisory Board meetings with implementing agency representatives. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Registered with ClinicalTrials.gov under identifier: NCT03628287, V.2, 25 September 2019; pre-results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.