Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32718921›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

Predicting major adverse cardiovascular events for secondary prevention: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of risk prediction models.

Ralph K Akyea, Jo Leonardi-Bee, Folkert W Asselbergs, Riyaz S Patel, Paul Durrington, Anthony S Wierzbicki, Oluwaseun H Ibiwoye, Joe Kai, Nadeem Qureshi, Stephen F Weng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Mitigating Bias in Opportunistic Screening for MACE with Causal Reasoning.IEEE transactions on artificial intelligence · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Ten-year predictors of major adverse cardiovascular events in patients without angina.South African family practice : official journal of the South African Academy of Family Practice/Primary Care · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ralph K AkyeaDivision of Primary Care, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK mszrka@nottingham.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-4529-8237
Jo Leonardi-BeeDivision of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Folkert W AsselbergsDepartment of Cardiology, Division Heart & Lungs, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Riyaz S PatelInstitute of Cardiovascular Science, Faculty of Population Health Sciences, University College London, London, UK.
Paul DurringtonCardiovascular Research Group, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Anthony S WierzbickiGuy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Oluwaseun H IbiwoyeDivision of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Joe KaiDivision of Primary Care, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Nadeem QureshiDivision of Primary Care, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4909-0644
Stephen F WengDivision of Primary Care, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.

Funding

British Heart Foundation FS/14/76/30933
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality globally. With advances in early diagnosis and treatment of CVD and increasing life expectancy, more people are surviving initial CVD events. However, models for stratifying disease severity risk in patients with established CVD for effective secondary prevention strategies are inadequate. Multivariable prognostic models to stratify CVD risk may allow personalised treatment interventions. This review aims to systematically review the existing multivariable prognostic models for the recurrence of CVD or major adverse cardiovascular events in adults with established CVD diagnosis. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Bibliographic databases (Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO and Web of Science) will be searched, from database inception to April 2020, using terms relating to the clinical area and prognosis. A hand search of the reference lists of included studies will also be done to identify additional published studies. No restrictions on language of publications will be applied. Eligible studies present multivariable models (derived or validated) of adults (aged 16 years and over) with an established diagnosis of CVD, reporting at least one of the components of the primary outcome of major adverse cardiovascular events (defined as either coronary heart disease, stroke, peripheral artery disease, heart failure or CVD-related mortality). Reviewing will be done by two reviewers independently using the pre-defined criteria. Data will be extracted for included full-text articles. Risk of bias will be assessed using the Prediction model study Risk Of Bias ASsessment Tool (PROBAST). Prognostic models will be summarised narratively. If a model is tested in multiple validation studies, the predictive performance will be summarised using a random-effects meta-analysis model to account for any between-study heterogeneity. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval is not required. The results of this study will be submitted to relevant conferences for presentation and a peer-reviewed journal for publication. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019149111.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesHeart FailureStrokeAdolescentAdultHumansMeta-Analysis as TopicNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalReview Literature as TopicRisk Assessmentcardiovascular diseaseprognosticprognostic multivariable modelsprotocolsecondary preventionsystematic review and meta-analysis

Identifiers

PMID32718921
PMCPMC7389481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.