ArticleBMJ open2020
Predicting major adverse cardiovascular events for secondary prevention: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of risk prediction models.
Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Artificial intelligence in the risk prediction models of cardiovascular disease and development of an independent validation screening tool: a systematic review.BMC medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Associations between statins and adverse events in primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: systematic review with pairwise, network, and dose-response meta-analyses.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2021 · on this mapPooled it
- The prognostic role of glycemic variability in predicting the risk of adverse cardiovascular events in patients with cardiovascular diseases: a meta-analysis.Diabetology & metabolic syndrome · 2025Review
- A clinical audit of adverse post-nephrectomy outcomes in renal cell carcinoma patients at a tertiary hospital in Queensland, Australia.Journal of nephrology · 2025Article
- Rates of Infections, Malignancies, Cardiovascular Outcomes, and Death in Individuals with Hospital-treated Alopecia Areata: A Registry-based Cohort Study in Denmark.Acta dermato-venereologica · 2025Article
- Mitigating Bias in Opportunistic Screening for MACE with Causal Reasoning.IEEE transactions on artificial intelligence · 2025Article
- Diabetes Complications and Comorbidities as Risk Factors for MACE in People With Type 2 Diabetes and Their Development Over Time: A Danish Registry-Based Case-Control Study.Journal of diabetes · 2025Article
- Ten-year predictors of major adverse cardiovascular events in patients without angina.South African family practice : official journal of the South African Academy of Family Practice/Primary Care · 2023Article
- Incidence Rates of Infections, Malignancies, Thromboembolism, and Cardiovascular Events in an Alopecia Areata Cohort from a US Claims Database.Dermatology and therapy · 2023Article
- T-Wave Analysis on the 24 h Holter ECG Monitoring as a Predictive Assessment of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Patients with Myocardial Infarction: A Literature Review and Future Perspectives.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Risk Stratification of Acute-Onset Chest Pain: SVEAT Score Versus HEART and TIMI Scores.Cureus · 2023Article
- The prognostic value of quality of life in atrial fibrillation on patient value.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2023Article
- Treatment of Complex Two-Vessel Coronary Heart Disease with Single Left Internal Mammary Artery as T-Graft with Itself-A Retrospective Double Center Analysis of Short-Term Outcomes.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2022Review
- Targeted next-generation sequencing for genetic variants of left ventricular mass status among community-based adults in Taiwan.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionCardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality globally. With advances in early diagnosis and treatment of CVD and increasing life expectancy, more people are surviving initial CVD events. However, models for stratifying disease severity risk in patients with established CVD for effective secondary prevention strategies are inadequate. Multivariable prognostic models to stratify CVD risk may allow personalised treatment interventions. This review aims to systematically review the existing multivariable prognostic models for the recurrence of CVD or major adverse cardiovascular events in adults with established CVD diagnosis. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Bibliographic databases (Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO and Web of Science) will be searched, from database inception to April 2020, using terms relating to the clinical area and prognosis. A hand search of the reference lists of included studies will also be done to identify additional published studies. No restrictions on language of publications will be applied. Eligible studies present multivariable models (derived or validated) of adults (aged 16 years and over) with an established diagnosis of CVD, reporting at least one of the components of the primary outcome of major adverse cardiovascular events (defined as either coronary heart disease, stroke, peripheral artery disease, heart failure or CVD-related mortality). Reviewing will be done by two reviewers independently using the pre-defined criteria. Data will be extracted for included full-text articles. Risk of bias will be assessed using the Prediction model study Risk Of Bias ASsessment Tool (PROBAST). Prognostic models will be summarised narratively. If a model is tested in multiple validation studies, the predictive performance will be summarised using a random-effects meta-analysis model to account for any between-study heterogeneity. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval is not required. The results of this study will be submitted to relevant conferences for presentation and a peer-reviewed journal for publication. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019149111.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.