ArticleBMC cancer2020
Efficient mutation screening for cervical cancers from circulating tumor DNA in blood.
Article in BMC cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- PIK3CA Polymorphisms in Cervical Cancer: Differential Impact of rs6443624 and rs141178472.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2026Article
- Minimal Residual Disease Detection: Bridging Molecular and Clinical Strategies for Recurrence Prevention in Gynecologic Cancers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- The application of liquid biopsy techniques in cervical cancer diagnosis, prediction and therapeutic surveillance.Journal of gynecologic oncology · 2025Review
- Cervical Cancer Biomarkers in Non-Cervical Samples: Emerging Tools for Diagnosis and Prognosis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Circulating Tumor DNA in Cervical Cancer: Clinical Utility and Medico-Legal Perspectives.Oncology research · 2025Review
- Cervical Cancer Genetic Profile through Circulating Tumor DNA: What Can We Learn from Blood?Biomolecules · 2024Review
- Clinical applications and utility of ctDNA in cervical cancer and its precursor lesions: from screening to predictive biomarker.Cancer cell international · 2023Review
- Article
- Increased Gene Expression ofCells · 2023Article
- Metabolism-associated molecular classification of cervical cancer.BMC women's health · 2023Article
- Testing for Human Papillomaviruses in Urine, Blood, and Oral Specimens: an Update for the Laboratory.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2023Review
- Plasma Cell-Free DNA in Uterine Cervical Cancer: Therapeutic Monitoring and Prognostic Values after Radical Radiotherapy.Cancer research and treatment · 2023Article
- Clinical applications and utility of cell-free DNA-based liquid biopsy analyses in cervical cancer and its precursor lesions.British journal of cancer · 2022Review
- Exploration of biomarkers for the diagnosis, treatment and prognosis of cervical cancer: a review.Discover oncology · 2022Review
- Combined Liquid Biopsy Methylation Analysis of CADM1 and MAL in Cervical Cancer Patients.Cancers · 2022Article
- Utility of plasma circulating tumor DNA and tumor DNA profiles in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Circulating Virus-Host Chimera DNAs in the Clinical Monitoring of Virus-Related Cancers.Cancers · 2022Review
- Rapid Multiplex Strip Test for the Detection of Circulating Tumor DNA Mutations for Liquid Biopsy Applications.Biosensors · 2022Article
- New Trends in the Detection of Gynecological Precancerous Lesions and Early-Stage Cancers.Cancers · 2021Review
- Molecular Markers to Predict Prognosis and Treatment Response in Uterine Cervical Cancer.Cancers · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEarly diagnosis and continuous monitoring are necessary for an efficient management of cervical cancers (CC). Liquid biopsy, such as detecting circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) from blood, is a simple, non-invasive method for testing and monitoring cancer markers. However, tumor-specific alterations in ctDNA have not been extensively investigated or compared to other circulating biomarkers in the diagnosis and monitoring of the CC. Therfore, Next-generation sequencing (NGS) analysis with blood samples can be a new approach for highly accurate diagnosis and monitoring of the CC.
methodUsing a bioinformatics approach, we designed a panel of 24 genes associated with CC to detect and characterize patterns of somatic single-nucleotide variations, indels, and copy number variations. Our NGS CC panel covers most of the genes in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) as well as additional cancer driver and tumor suppressor genes. We profiled the variants in ctDNA from 24 CC patients who were being treated with systemic chemotherapy and local radiotherapy at the Jeonbuk National University Hospital, Korea.
resultEighteen out of 24 genes in our NGS CC panel had mutations across the 24 CC patients, including somatic alterations of mutated genes (ZFHX3-83%, KMT2C-79%, KMT2D-79%, NSD1-67%, ATM-38% and RNF213-27%). We demonstrated that the RNF213 mutation could be used potentially used as a monitoring marker for response to chemo- and radiotherapy.
conclusionWe developed our NGS CC panel and demostrated that our NGS panel can be useful for the diagnosis and monitoring of the CC, since the panel detected the common somatic variations in CC patients and we observed how these genetic variations change according to the treatment pattern of the patient.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.