Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32718341›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2020

Efficient mutation screening for cervical cancers from circulating tumor DNA in blood.

Sun-Young Lee, Dong-Kyu Chae, Sung-Hun Lee, Yohan Lim, Jahyun An, Chang Hoon Chae, Byung Chul Kim, Jong Bhak, Dan Bolser, Dong-Hyu Cho

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Sun-Young LeeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Jeonbuk National University Hospital-Jeonbuk National University Medical School, Jeonju, Jeonbuk, Republic of Korea.
Dong-Kyu ChaeClinomics Inc, Suwon, 16229, Republic of Korea.
Sung-Hun LeeClinomics Inc, Suwon, 16229, Republic of Korea.
Yohan LimClinomics Inc, Suwon, 16229, Republic of Korea.
Jahyun AnClinomics Inc, Suwon, 16229, Republic of Korea.
Chang Hoon ChaeDepartment of Biophysics and Radiation Biology, Lab of Nanochemistry, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Byung Chul KimClinomics Inc, Suwon, 16229, Republic of Korea.
Jong BhakClinomics Inc, Suwon, 16229, Republic of Korea.
Dan BolserGeromics LTD, Cambridge, CB1 1AH, UK.
Dong-Hyu ChoResearch Institute of Clinical Medicine of Jeonbuk National University-Biomedical Research Institute of Jeonbuk National University Hospital, Jeonju, Republic of Korea. obgyn2001@jbnu.ac.kr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1557-9575
Jeonbuk National University Hospital · KRSemmelweis University · HUUlsan National Institute of Science and Technology · KR

Funding

Korea Industrial Technology Association KOITAR&D150405Nation Research Foundation 2017M3A9F7074175Nation Research Foundation 2017R1A2B4012353Ul-san Research Fund of UNIST 1.180024.01Ulsan Research Fund of UNIST 1.180017.01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEarly diagnosis and continuous monitoring are necessary for an efficient management of cervical cancers (CC). Liquid biopsy, such as detecting circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) from blood, is a simple, non-invasive method for testing and monitoring cancer markers. However, tumor-specific alterations in ctDNA have not been extensively investigated or compared to other circulating biomarkers in the diagnosis and monitoring of the CC. Therfore, Next-generation sequencing (NGS) analysis with blood samples can be a new approach for highly accurate diagnosis and monitoring of the CC.

methodUsing a bioinformatics approach, we designed a panel of 24 genes associated with CC to detect and characterize patterns of somatic single-nucleotide variations, indels, and copy number variations. Our NGS CC panel covers most of the genes in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) as well as additional cancer driver and tumor suppressor genes. We profiled the variants in ctDNA from 24 CC patients who were being treated with systemic chemotherapy and local radiotherapy at the Jeonbuk National University Hospital, Korea.

resultEighteen out of 24 genes in our NGS CC panel had mutations across the 24 CC patients, including somatic alterations of mutated genes (ZFHX3-83%, KMT2C-79%, KMT2D-79%, NSD1-67%, ATM-38% and RNF213-27%). We demonstrated that the RNF213 mutation could be used potentially used as a monitoring marker for response to chemo- and radiotherapy.

conclusionWe developed our NGS CC panel and demostrated that our NGS panel can be useful for the diagnosis and monitoring of the CC, since the panel detected the common somatic variations in CC patients and we observed how these genetic variations change according to the treatment pattern of the patient.

Indexed as

MutationAdenocarcinomaAdenosine TriphosphatasesAgedCarcinoma, Squamous CellCirculating Tumor DNAClass I Phosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesDNA-Binding ProteinsFemaleGenetic MarkersHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHomeodomain ProteinsHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm ProteinsProspective StudiesAdenosine TriphosphatasesCirculating Tumor DNAClass I Phosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesDNA-Binding ProteinsGenetic MarkersHomeodomain ProteinsKMT2C protein, humanKMT2D protein, humanKRAS protein, humanNeoplasm ProteinsPIK3CA protein, humanProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)RNF213 protein, humanUbiquitin-Protein LigasesZFHX3 protein, humanCancer panelCervical cancerCirculating tumor DNAGenomic alterationNext-generation-sequencing

Identifiers

PMID32718341
PMCPMC7385901
OpenAlexW3045532125

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.