Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32718314›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2020

Transcriptome analysis of the uterus of hens laying eggs differing in cuticle deposition.

Sandra Poyatos Pertiñez, Peter W Wilson, Wiebke Icken, David Cavero, Maureen M Bain, Anita C Jones, Ian C Dunn

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Sandra Poyatos PertiñezThe Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush Campus, Midlothian, EH25 9RG, Scotland, UK. Sandra.Poyatos@roslin.ed.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3633-9033
Peter W WilsonThe Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush Campus, Midlothian, EH25 9RG, Scotland, UK.
Wiebke IckenLohmann Tierzucht, 7454, Cuxhaven, Germany.
David CaveroH&N International, 27472, Cuxhaven, Germany.
Maureen M BainCollege of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences (MVLS), IBAHCM, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, UK.
Anita C JonesSchool of Chemistry, University of Edinburgh, Joseph Black Building, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK.
Ian C DunnThe Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush Campus, Midlothian, EH25 9RG, Scotland, UK.
Roslin Institute · GBLohmann Tierzucht (Germany) · DEUniversity of Edinburgh · GBUniversity of Glasgow · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/K006096/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/K0070921/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/D/05191132Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/D/20211550Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/D/20211552Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/D/20211553Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/D/20320000
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAvian eggs have a proteinaceous cuticle. The quantity of cuticle varies and the deposition of a good cuticle in the uterus (Shell-gland) prevents transmission of bacteria to the egg contents.

resultsTo understand cuticle deposition, uterus transcriptomes were compared between hens with i) naturally good and poor cuticle and, ii) where manipulation of the hypothalamo-pituitary-gonadal-oviduct axis produced eggs with or without cuticle. The highest expressed genes encoded eggshell matrix and cuticle proteins, e.g. MEPE (OC-116), BPIFB3 (OVX-36), RARRES1 (OVX-32), WAP (OVX-25), and genes for mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation, active transport and energy metabolism. Expression of a number of these genes differed between hens laying eggs with or without cuticle. There was also a high expression of clock genes. PER2, CRY2, CRY1, CLOCK and BMAL1 were differentially expressed when cuticle deposition was prevented, and they also changed throughout the egg formation cycle. This suggests an endogenous clock in the uterus may be a component of cuticle deposition control. Cuticle proteins are glycosylated and glycosaminoglycan binding genes had a lower expression when cuticle proteins were deposited on the egg. The immediate early genes, JUN and FOS, were expressed less when the cuticle had not been deposited and changed over the egg formation cycle, suggesting they are important in oviposition and cuticle deposition. The uterus transcriptome of hens with good and poor cuticle deposition did not differ.

conclusionsWe have gained insights into the factors that can affect the production of the cuticle especially clock genes and immediate early genes. We have demonstrated that these genes change their expression over the period of eggshell formation supporting their importance. The lack of differences in expression between the uterus of hens laying eggs with the best and worse cuticle suggest the genetic basis of the trait may lie outside the oviduct.

Indexed as

ChickensEgg ShellAnimalsCarrier ProteinsEggsFemaleGene Expression ProfilingHumansMembrane ProteinsOviductsOvipositionUterusBPIFB3 protein, humanCarrier ProteinsMembrane ProteinsRARRES1 protein, humanChickenCuticleEggNext generation sequencingOviductOvipositionTranscriptomeUterus

Identifiers

PMID32718314
PMCPMC7385972
OpenAlexW3045419035

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.