Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32718306›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2020

Magnitude of problematic anger and its predictors in the Millennium Cohort.

Amy B Adler, Cynthia A LeardMann, Kimberly A Roenfeldt, Isabel G Jacobson, David Forbes, Millennium Cohort Study Team

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. 'Hidden' anger as a risk factor for operational health: An exploratory approach among French military personnel.Military psychology : the official journal of the Division of Military Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Amy B AdlerWalter Reed Army Institute of Research, Silver Spring, MD, USA.
Cynthia A LeardMannDeployment Health Research Department, Naval Health Research Center, 140 Sylvester Road, San Diego, CA, 92106, USA. cynthia.a.leardmann.ctr@mail.mil.
Kimberly A RoenfeldtLeidos, 11951 Freedom Drive, Reston, VA, USA.
Isabel G JacobsonDeployment Health Research Department, Naval Health Research Center, 140 Sylvester Road, San Diego, CA, 92106, USA.
David ForbesPhoenix Australia - Centre for Posttraumatic Mental Health, Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Millennium Cohort Study Team
Leidos (United States) · USNaval Health Research Center · USThe University of Melbourne · AUWalter Reed Army Institute of Research · US

Funding

Defense Health Program nAMilitary Operational Medicine Research Program NAU.S. Department of Veterans Affairs NA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProblematic anger is intense anger associated with elevated generalized distress and that interferes with functioning. It also confers a heightened risk for the development of mental health problems. In military personnel and veterans, previous studies examining problematic anger have been constrained by sample size, cross-sectional data, and measurement limitations.

methodsThe current study used Millennium Cohort survey data (N = 90,266) from two time points (2013 and 2016 surveys) to assess the association of baseline demographics, military factors, mental health, positive perspective, and self-mastery, with subsequent problematic anger.

resultsOverall, 17.3% of respondents reported problematic anger. In the fully adjusted logistic regression model, greater risk of problematic anger was predicted by certain demographic characteristics as well as childhood trauma and financial problems. Service members who were in the Army or Marines, active duty (vs. reserves/national guard), and previously deployed with high levels of combat had increased risk for problematic anger. Veterans were also more likely to report problematic anger than currently serving personnel. Mental health predictors included posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), major depressive disorder (MDD), and comorbid PTSD/MDD. Higher levels of positive perspective and self-mastery were associated with decreased risk of problematic anger.

conclusionNot only did 1 in 6 respondents report problematic anger, but risk factors were significant even after adjusting for PTSD and MDD, suggesting that problematic anger is more than an expression of these mental health problems. Results identify potential targets of early intervention and clinical treatment for addressing problematic anger in the military and veteran context.

Indexed as

AngerAdultCohort StudiesComorbidityCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMajor Depressive DisorderMaleMiddle AgedMilitary PersonnelRisk FactorsStress Disorders, Post-TraumaticVeteransAngerCohort studiesMilitary

Identifiers

PMID32718306
PMCPMC7385895
OpenAlexW3045583203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.