Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32718033›Full record

ArticleMicroorganisms2020

Charlotte M Ahle, Kristian Stødkilde, Mastaneh Afshar, Anja Poehlein, Lesley A Ogilvie, Bo Söderquist, Jennifer Hüpeden, Holger Brüggemann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microorganisms, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Skin Microbiome in Prurigo Nodularis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Nasal Dysbiosis in Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma Is Characterized by Shifts in Relative Abundances of Non-JID innovations : skin science from molecules to population health · 2022
    Article
  11. Across-Shift Changes in Viable Nasal Bacteria among Waste-Incineration Plant Workers-A Pilot Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Biofilm formation and inflammatory potential ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Charlotte M AhleBeiersdorf AG, Research & Development, Front End Innovation, 20245 Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4688-0061
Kristian StødkildeDepartment of Biomedicine, Aarhus University, 8000 Aarhus, Denmark.
Mastaneh AfsharDepartment of Biomedicine, Aarhus University, 8000 Aarhus, Denmark.
Anja PoehleinDepartment of Genomic and Applied Microbiology, Institute of Microbiology and Genetics, University of Göttingen, 37073 Göttingen, Germany.
Lesley A OgilvieMax Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics, 14195 Berlin, Germany.
Bo SöderquistDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Clinical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, S-701 82 Örebro, Sweden.
Jennifer HüpedenBeiersdorf AG, Research & Development, Front End Innovation, 20245 Hamburg, Germany.
Holger BrüggemannDepartment of Biomedicine, Aarhus University, 8000 Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-7433-0190

Funding

Novo Nordisk NNF18OC0053172
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coagulase-negative staphylococcal species constitute an important part of the human skin microbiota. In particular, facultative anaerobic species such as

Indexed as

amplicon next generation sequencingcoagulase-negative staphylococciskin microbiomeskin microbiotaStaphylococcus saccharolyticus

Identifiers

PMID32718033
PMCPMC7465461

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.