ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2020
Validated Finite Element Models of Premolars: A Scoping Review.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative analysis of postoperative mechanical behavior of immature premolars: apexification vs regeneration.Odontology · 2026Article
- Biomechanical effects of titanium alloy removable partial denture framework designs fabricated by selective laser melting in mandibular Kennedy class II partial edentulism: A finite element study.Journal of dental sciences · 2026Article
- Finite element analysis in dentistry: a comprehensive narrative review of biomechanical principles, clinical applications, and future perspectives.Frontiers in dental medicine · 2026Review
- Complicated crown fractures in maxillary central incisors restored by fragment reattachment technique: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- How different scenarios of a maxillary central incisor with endodontic microsurgery, fiber post, and periodontal loss affect biomechanical behavior: a finite element analysis study.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Finite element analysis in the Dental Sciences: A Bibliometric and a Visual Study.International dental journal · 2025Article
- Efficacy of the finite element analysis in assessing the effects of light curing on the mechanical properties of direct restorative composites: A systematic review.Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry · 2024Review
- Functional Load Capacity of Teeth with Reduced Periodontal Support: A Finite Element Analysis.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Assessment of biomechanical behavior of immature non-vital incisors with various treatment modalities by means of three-dimensional quasi-static finite element analysis.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Stronger than Ever: Multifilament Fiberglass Posts Boost Maxillary Premolar Fracture Resistance.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Do the Mechanical Properties of Calcium-Silicate-Based Cements Influence the Stress Distribution of Different Retrograde Cavity Preparations?Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Real-time simulation of the transplanted tooth using model order reduction.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Article
- Effect of partial restorative treatment on stress distributions in non-carious cervical lesions: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.BMC oral health · 2022Article
- Finite element and in vitro study on biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated premolars restored with direct or indirect composite restorations.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Multifactorial Analysis of Endodontic Microsurgery Using Finite Element Models.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Article
- A critical analysis of research methods and experimental models to study the load capacity and clinical behaviour of the root filled teeth.International endodontic journal · 2022Review
- A Preliminary In Vitro Study of 3D Full-Field Strain Distribution in Human Whole Premolars Using Digital Image Correlation.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Finite element (FE) models are widely used to investigate the biomechanics of reconstructed premolars. However, parameter identification is a complex step because experimental validation cannot always be conducted. The aim of this study was to collect the experimentally validated FE models of premolars, extract their parameters, and discuss trends. A systematic review was performed following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Records were identified in three electronic databases (MEDLINE [PubMed], Scopus, The Cochrane Library) by two independent reviewers. Twenty-seven parameters dealing with failure criteria, model construction, material laws, boundary conditions, and model validation were extracted from the included articles. From 1306 records, 214 were selected for eligibility and entirely read. Among them, 19 studies were included. A heterogeneity was observed for several parameters associated with failure criteria and model construction. Elasticity, linearity, and isotropy were more often chosen for dental and periodontal tissues with a Young's modulus mostly set at 18-18.6 GPa for dentine. Loading was mainly simulated by an axial force, and FE models were mostly validated by in vitro tests evaluating tooth strains, but different conditions about experiment type, sample size, and tooth status (intact or restored) were reported. In conclusion, material laws identified herein could be applied to future premolar FE models. However, further investigations such as sensitivity analysis are required for several parameters to clarify their indication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.