ReviewCurrent opinion in genetics & development2020
Methods for detecting introgressed archaic sequences.
Review in Current opinion in genetics & development, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Archaic ancestry inference in imputed ancient human genomes.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Recent advances in methods to characterize archaic introgression in modern humans.Genome research · 2026Review
- Ignoring population structure in hominin evolutionary models can lead to the inference of spurious admixture events.Nature ecology & evolution · 2025Article
- Recurrent gene flow between Neanderthals and modern humans over the past 200,000 years.Science (New York, N.Y.) · 2024Article
- Inference of Locus-Specific Population Mixtures from Linked Genome-Wide Allele Frequencies.Molecular biology and evolution · 2024Article
- Introgression.Current biology : CB · 2022Article
- "Archealization" of human brain organoids.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2022Article
- Multispecies coalescent and its applications to infer species phylogenies and cross-species gene flow.National science review · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Analysis of genome sequences from archaic and modern humans have revealed multiple episodes of admixture between highly-diverged population groups. Statistical methods that attempt to localize DNA segments introduced by these events offer a powerful tool to investigate recent human evolution. We review recent advances in methods for detecting introgressed sequences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.